Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

Winger circlejerk alert

lambert's picture

TNR on Scott Beauchamp:

Fog of War
When I last spoke with Beauchamp in early November, he continued to stand by his stories. Unfortunately, the standards of this magazine require more than that. And, in light of the evidence available to us, after months of intensive re-reporting, we cannot be confident that the events in his pieces occurred in exactly the manner that he described them. Without that essential confidence, we cannot stand by these stories.

Sluttish, pouty-lipped, autocoprophagic concentration camp advocate and stalker-of-twelve-year-olds Michelle Malkin is going to turn the knobs all the way up to 11, isn't she? We're going be hearing the words "liberal New Republic"* until our ears bleed. (And--just in case there's been a sudden outbreak of intellectual honesty on the right--what are we hearing about NRO's own fabulist as Conservative Andrew Sullivan calls him? *** Crickets *** As expected.)

And now we know exactly how the dolchstosslegende (stab in the back theory) is going to be propagated, don't we?

Because what's remarkable about the story is that TNR has no inkling of the war they're actually in: Military PR strategists working through winger bloggers against anyone who won't chant the Partei line. (Oh? You think Beauchamp was about the truth? You think Beauchamp will be the last?) TNR's extremely lengthy retraction is full of detail showing this, but do they see what's under their noses? No. For that, TNR does, in fact, deserve the Darwin Award.

NOTE * TNR, "liberal"? As if.

NOTE 1 Seems like they're practicing their stalking techniques on TNR too, showing up at the offices with video, and such. How exciting for them.

NOTE 2 The story also shows really bad institutional judgment on TNR's part, as well as the thin-ness of its personnel. For a time, Beauchamp's wife doing factchecking for TNR on Beauchamp. Maybe in the incestuous world of the Village, that doesn't seem strange, but outside the Beltway? It looks like a clear conflict of interest. And Beauchamp seems to have been brought to TNR's attention by an intern. Seems an odd way to recruit sources, especially in a war zone. If Beauchamp has been able to work through Kos, for example, any issues with his story would have been rapidly ferreted out by that massive community, one which is not at all befogged by the winger war against journalism, as poor, weak, and ill-adapted TNR was.

0
No votes yet

Comments

Submitted by [Please enter a... (not verified) on

I didn't understand Foer's piece at all. He spent 13 of 14 pages documenting the extent to which the PR machine for the military conspired with right-wing media and bloggers to undercut the New Republic. Along the way, it was clear that both the New Republic and Beauchamp were acting in good faith. And then, suddenly, out of left field, Foer suddenly says TNR can no longer stand behind Beauchamp's articles, and gives no coherent explanation why.

lambert's picture
Submitted by lambert on

And no, it didn't make sense, though you could tell from the style what he was leading up to. On the other hand, I sympathize with TNR and even, just a little, with NRO. On the Internet, anyone could be a dog....

Amazing the way the military wants to keep the military hermetically sealed, listening only to Rush, et al. Why would that be, I wonder?

We. Are. Going. To. Die. We must restore hope in the world. We must bring forth a new way of living that can sustain the world. Or else it is not just us who will die but everyone. What have we got to lose? Go forth and Fight!—Xan

Turlock