Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

Understanding Kleptocracy

Foreclosuregate has focused attention yet again on the scams and frauds of the banks. And with it has come a revisiting of all the other scams and frauds the banks ran, and in most cases are still running, in the housing bubble and its aftermath, in CDOs and CDSs, in the greater world of derivatives, and in markets and the economy generally. But will it last? Will it lead to effective action? I don't think so. For there to be an effective response there needs to be a reasonably complete understanding of the problem. And I don't see that happening.

Everyday there are new articles about fresh ways the banks were and are scamming us. You just have to wander over to a place like Naked Capitalism today to see articles about how loan servicers weren't just screwing borrowers but investors or how banks took a cut on profits from pension fund investments but shared none of their losses. There are dozens of scams out there run thousands, even millions, of times, but they are presented to us piecemeal. There is no overarching synthesis of what they represent.

We, of course, know it as kleptocracy. Kleptocracy is not a sometime thing. It is about looting anything that can be looted, as much as it can be looted, anywhere it can be looted. It is a serious, and very criminal, undertaking. And it has real victims. People's lives are ruined by it. People die from it.

Kleptocracy thrives because virtually all of our society's official apparatus promotes it and benefits from it. You have only to look at the Obama Administration's casting foreclosuregate as nothing more than a technical glitch in the paperwork, hardly worth bothering about, certainly nothing to justify a national foreclosure moratorium. Immediately taking the side of the banksters against distressed homeowners, and these are the Democrats, you know the party that is supposed to care about ordinary Americans.

As I said, kleptocracy is not a sometime thing. It is the lens through which we must view all public acts and events. We need to understand kleptocracy better. We need a politics of kleptocracy. We need an economics of kleptocracy.

This last was brought home to me recently by a couple of articles, one by Roubini on the balance of payments issue and one by Krugman on the mortgage morass. Fairly schizophrenically, Roubini argued that the US, meaning the middle class, needed to engage in austerity over and above what it currently is suffering and industries needed to export more, and that this wouldn't work. What was missing in Roubini's piece was any awareness of how kleptocracy and the massive inequality in wealth it has spawned play into the whole international trade scenario: transfer of wealth from the middle class, use of said wealth to finance outsourcing overseas, increased indebtedness and disappearance of the middle class. It is the proverbial 800 lb. gorilla in the room and Roubini either doesn't see it or ignores it.

The same thing with Krugman. Lots of problems in the mortgage industry. But no synthesis. It is like looking at a car but seeing it only as an assemblage of car parts without ever acknowledging that it is a car and what a car is used for.

Neither Roubini nor Krugman can ever accept that what we have in this country is kleptocracy because it totally negates every economic position they have ever taken and sets at nothing the high social status they have acquired in the kleptocratic hierarchy.

Still it is important to realize that our country is being run on kleptocratic principles, that the goal of kleptocracy is economic feudalism, but that it is inherently unstable and unsustainable. It has not off switch. It goes until the kleptocrats crash so badly they can't maintain their power to lie and steal by lying and stealing.

This is where all economic and political analysis should be focused, and where almost none of it is. But to understand what is going on and how it will play out, such a focus is absolutely necessary.

0
No votes yet

Comments

MsExPat's picture
Submitted by MsExPat on

I'd add that you need to look at kleptocracy from a global perspective. Some decades ago, it was confined to Third World economies. But now you have a world in which major players--China, for instance--have normalized kleptocracy to the point where national law and policy is designed to keep it in place.

The US in its foreign policy has always put "Spreading Democracy" at the top of its list, at least in their official blah blah blah. But I think that Rule of Law has shaped up to be the far more crucial global issue. Globalization of capitalism has eroded it, because if you don't like the rules of one nation, you can move your money someplace else where it is easier to steal and skim.

Then, as the practices of that other place become the norm, it puts pressure on the laws and regulations in more restrictive places.

You see this happening not only in finance, but in environment, human rights and labor practices.

chicago dyke's picture
Submitted by chicago dyke on

and yeah, it's the Banana Republic model, and the blowback of imperialism and technology without pity or ideology. and racism, but that's another post.

anyway. if you're a working slob, you don't need a fancy education to perceive what it is. if you're lucky enough to have traveled to a country where the Rule of Law has been dead for decades, you can see what's happening here very clearly. the US is the new China, yo. get ready for air you can't breathe, water you can't drink, and melanine poisoned children while "your" government grants contracts to foreigners who clear cut your parklands and dump their toxic waste in your watersheds.

i have a thesis about it, but now isn't the time for me to write it. short version: all this was inevitable, with the creation of an a-historic, a-national "global elite" empowered by technology. the elite of today can pick up and move anywhere that's still clean and quiet and pretty, anytime the places they've shat upon get too ugly. some of them choose to stay and lord their wealth over us (see that Indian rich guy building a skyscraper "house" for himself and his three kids and wife... overlooking the slums wtf?) but mostly, the uberrich are hanging out in resorts and Gstaad and other places where we Little People are never allowed except as servants, and sometimes not even then.

historically, it was very different when a Prussian or Roman or Han noble had to live on the same estate as the peasant they oppressed. that makes a big difference, yo. until and unless there are no more Monacos and the private jets and private "equity" to pay for all that, we're sort of fucked. Erik Prince, anyone?

computers + "global finance" = the evil that we suffer today. the only way out is to remove ~30,000 global elite uberrich heads from their bodies.

TonyRz's picture
Submitted by TonyRz on

if you're lucky enough to have traveled to a country where the Rule of Law has been dead for decades, you can see what's happening here very clearly.

Yeah, remember when you used to hear stories about places like Belize, where, when you "bought" property, it really wasn't "yours", and one's only option was STFU, and you were glad to be in the YOO ESS AY?

As Chris Farley used to say on SNL: "That was awesome."

BruceW07's picture
Submitted by BruceW07 on

Mike Konczal, of Rortybomb fame, has started a meditation on the "meaning" of the foreclosure documentation problems, and he takes as his chief interlocuter, Arnold Kling, who has argued, in the fashion typical of conservative libertarians, that losers (aka debtors in default) have no rights any corporation is bound to respect.

Kling, an economics professor at George Mason University, the state-funded public university, owned and controlled by the billionaire Koch brothers, who also fund the Tea Party, claims to be a libertarian, but, of course, he's arguing for authoritarianism.

Opposition to authoritarianism -- a defining virtue of liberals for 200 years -- will be job 1 for liberals is battling the kleptocracy. One key marker of progress on this front will be if we can take away from the libertarians the ability to define "the issue" as the size and scope of government, and make it what it clearly is: the arbitrary authoritarianism, which the new feudalism requires.