A blog (from "web blog") is a discussion or informational site consisting of discrete entries ("posts") typically displayed newest first. All Corrente posts are front-paged; there is no up-rate or down-rate process. Corrente posts are almost entirely community moderated. We encourage a clash of ideas, and do not encourage a clash of persons.
If you are the author of this post, see the Edit tab ad Help (and Advanced Help) for detailed documentation.
Additional failures of large banks or savings and loans companies seem likely, and that could overwhelm the FDIC's insurance fund, said Brian Bethune, U.S. economist at consulting firm Global Insight.
I'm linking to now is not the same thing. H/t to Downticket at the Confluence for this vid of Senator Clinton assessing, dissecting and addressing the current financial crisis. Pretty fuc*ing awesome. Shame that our presidential candidates cannot put a few sentences together on this topic and it's a damned shame that we won't have this type of representation in the WH.
"The fund, which is marking its 75th anniversary this year with a "Face Your Finances" campaign, is at $45.2 billion — the lowest level since 2003. At the same time, the number of troubled banks is at a five-year high."
Isn't one of the problems, as you, Lambert posted in another thread, the leveraging of these loans well beyond their value even as bad investments? I could see attakcing the problem from the other direction and spending all this money, and probably less, on shoring up the people with the mortgages. Then, maybe you could let the leveraged securities strangle the people who created them.
Fed and Treasury Offer to Work With Congress on Bailout Plan -- "the plan is likely to authorize the government to buy distressed mortgages at deep discounts from banks and other institutions. The proposal could result in the most direct commitment of taxpayer funds so far in the financial crisis that Fed and Treasury officials say is the worst they have ever seen.
Senior aides and lawmakers said the goal was to complete the legislation by the end of next week, ...
But whether a legislative consensus could be found remained an open question, and members of Mr. Bush’s own party were among those who were most critical of the increasing federal intervention in private markets.
At the meeting Thursday night, where officials said the atmosphere was tense, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the banking committee, was notably skeptical.
A spokesman for the senator, Jonathan Graffeo, said later: “Senator Shelby believes it’s his responsibility to be skeptical on behalf of taxpayers. He believes our goal must be to minimize taxpayer exposure while maximizing the benefit to the economy. ” ..." -- http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/busine...
i don't believe that the govt. buying all this debt will help people keep their homes--it might do the opposite, since the govt can easily garnish salaries and do all sorts of things about what people owe directly.
Comments
VL, at work i cannot see the vids (Barracuda) so I hope what
I'm linking to now is not the same thing. H/t to Downticket at the Confluence for this vid of Senator Clinton assessing, dissecting and addressing the current financial crisis. Pretty fuc*ing awesome. Shame that our presidential candidates cannot put a few sentences together on this topic and it's a damned shame that we won't have this type of representation in the WH.
http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statement...
I love this job!
Barracuda? Is Sarah Palin hacking back?
It was just a video set to Steely Dan's "Black Friday." But yours is more depressing...
Of all the words of mice and men
The saddest are, 'It might have been.'
For me, the money quote is:
"The fund, which is marking its 75th anniversary this year with a "Face Your Finances" campaign, is at $45.2 billion — the lowest level since 2003. At the same time, the number of troubled banks is at a five-year high."
It bears repeating. We're fkd.
I love this job!
Isn’t one of the
Isn't one of the problems, as you, Lambert posted in another thread, the leveraging of these loans well beyond their value even as bad investments? I could see attakcing the problem from the other direction and spending all this money, and probably less, on shoring up the people with the mortgages. Then, maybe you could let the leveraged securities strangle the people who created them.
tonight's developments--
Fed and Treasury Offer to Work With Congress on Bailout Plan -- "the plan is likely to authorize the government to buy distressed mortgages at deep discounts from banks and other institutions. The proposal could result in the most direct commitment of taxpayer funds so far in the financial crisis that Fed and Treasury officials say is the worst they have ever seen.
Senior aides and lawmakers said the goal was to complete the legislation by the end of next week, ...
But whether a legislative consensus could be found remained an open question, and members of Mr. Bush’s own party were among those who were most critical of the increasing federal intervention in private markets.
At the meeting Thursday night, where officials said the atmosphere was tense, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, the senior Republican on the banking committee, was notably skeptical.
A spokesman for the senator, Jonathan Graffeo, said later: “Senator Shelby believes it’s his responsibility to be skeptical on behalf of taxpayers. He believes our goal must be to minimize taxpayer exposure while maximizing the benefit to the economy. ” ..." -- http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/busine...
the GOP is playing populist--and i bet it works.
I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your policework
At this point, keeping people in their homes is going to to play as a lot more populist than low taxes, IMHO.
it'll take all the banks/firms off the hook, and
i don't believe that the govt. buying all this debt will help people keep their homes--it might do the opposite, since the govt can easily garnish salaries and do all sorts of things about what people owe directly.