Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

This Could Be Good News

You know that gesture wherein you put your forefinger sideways in your mouth, puff up your cheeks, push the finger out sharply to make a "pop" noise, then wave finger in the air? Signifies "big whoopin' do" in a rude and vulgar way. I was all ready to do that when I saw this headline...Times Names Public Editor, and since I couldn't click the mouse and raise that finger to the mouth at the same time I clicked first. Good move:

The New York Times today named its next public editor, Clark Hoyt, a former Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and editor who oversaw the Knight Ridder newspaper chain’s coverage that questioned the Bush administration’s case for the Iraq war.

Hmm. Not to sound like a racetrack tout trying to pick a winner in the Derby but this dude's bloodlines and recent workout times look good.

Interesting that this is the first time I've heard NYT say that "Public Editor" is a time-limited position.

I sure didn't hear anything about them sacking the previous holder of the post...come to think of it I don't remember hearing much of anything by, for, or about the previous holder of the post, unlike the first PO, who I clearly recall vilifying on a regular and well-deserved basis.

His appointment as public editor takes effect May 14 and lasts two years. He will be the third person to hold the position since The Times created it in 2003, following Daniel Okrent and Byron Calame. Mr. Keller said he considered, but ultimately rejected, the idea of hiring someone from within The Times, or someone from a digital news operation.

Somebody better check local glue factories to see what might have become of those two. Meanwhile this kid sounds promising. Let's see if he can go the distance on what's still, like it not, the Churchill Downs of American dead-tree journalism.

0
No votes yet

Comments

mattd's picture
Submitted by mattd on

It's standard practice for the big big news organizations to hire an ombudsman or "public editor" for a fixed, non-renewable contract -- that way, they say, there's no chance that the person could slant his or her findings to the newspaper's favor in an attempt to keep the job longer.

Some of the contracts specify that after the end of the ombudsman's tenure, he or she can't work for the news organization again for five years or ten years or whatever. I don't know about that for the Times, but both the first two guys and the new guy were time-limited from their first day on the job, by design. You don't want the ombudsman becoming a part of the culture he's intended to criticize as an "outsider."

Specifically, the first public editor at the NYT, Okrent, had a 18-month contract starting in October 2003. Calame, his successor, had a two-year contract that ends next week. The new guy also has a two-year contract.

--Matt

Submitted by [Please enter a... (not verified) on

Guess I had just never seen a specific contract length referenced before in stories about the Times Public Editor. I still think the title itself is a bit inane; by definition every editor should think of him-or herself as a Public Editor in representing the interests of their audience against the Powers That Be.

Why yes, yes I do live in Fantasyland a good deal of the time, why do you ask? :)

Turlock