Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

'The debates' are a game show- the winner gets to preside over our continued servitude

Rangoon78's picture

Corporate media, trying to keep a straight face, slips:

"Welcome to the first US presidential primary debate - the first round in the longest electoral game show in the world." -BBC

Chris Hedges spells out what's at work here:

The corporate state seeks to maintain the fiction of our personal agency in the political and economic process. As long as we believe we are participants, a lie sustained through massive propaganda campaigns, endless and absurd election cycles and the pageantry of empty political theater, our corporate oligarchs rest easy…

0
No votes yet
Updated: 

Comments

V. Arnold's picture
Submitted by V. Arnold on

It is really remarkable, these many candidates vying for coronation in 2016.
Of the declared; there is not one fit for office. 310 million U.S. citizens and they are all that's offered?
That, in and of it self, should be a flashing red light that all is not well; crisis mode should be in force.
There is not one qualified candidate presently running for the U.S.'s highest office; if that doesn't tell y'all that something's broken (understatement); then you're beyond redemption...

Rangoon78's picture
Submitted by Rangoon78 on

DC, You find fault with Hedges on strategy and/or tactics. I seem to remember back around Halloween 2008 you found admirable an article which championed the strategy and/or tactic of electing Obama to bring about Universal healthcare.

http://www.correntewire.com/healthcare_in_the_usa_pt_1

I think Chris saw that as a failing strategy and/or tactic as did I.

blues's picture
Submitted by blues on

I use strategic simple score voting. I can vote for up to 20 candidates, and give them from 5 to 10 votes each. I will give Jessie Ventura and Cynthia McKinney 10 votes each. In case those don't win, I will probably give some Democrat (but not Hillary Clinton) 9 or 8 votes. That way, I will sacrifice only 10 or 20 percent of my franchise.

Why use the absurd single-selection method that forces two-party lock-in?

Why bother with the Ivory Tower "voting theory" that takes up 30 pages in Wikipedia, requires fuzzy set theory, and is hopelessly complicated?