Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

The day of the RFIDs

Excellent Scientific American article on surveillance potential in the new RFID technology:

If you live in a state bordering Canada or Mexico, you may soon be given an opportunity to carry a very high tech item: a remotely readable driver’s license. Designed to identify U.S. citizens as they approach the nation’s borders, the cards are being promoted by the Department of Homeland Security as a way to save time and simplify border crossings. But if you care about your safety and privacy as much as convenience, you might want to think twice before signing up.

The new licenses come equipped with radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags that can be read right through a wallet, pocket or purse from as far away as 30 feet. Each tag incorporates a tiny microchip encoded with a unique identification number.

Although such “enhanced” driver’s licenses remain voluntary in the states that offer them, privacy and security experts are concerned that those who sign up for the cards are unaware of the risk: anyone with a readily available reader device—unscrupulous marketers, government agents, stalkers, thieves and just plain snoops—can also access the data on the licenses to remotely track people without their knowledge or consent. What is more, once the tag’s ID number is associated with an individual’s identity—for example, when the person carrying the license makes a credit-card transaction—the radio tag becomes a proxy for that individual. And the driver’s licenses are just the latest addition to a growing array of “tagged” items that consumers might be wearing or carrying around, such as transit and toll passes, office key cards, school IDs, “contactless” credit cards, clothing, phones and even groceries.

RFID tags have been likened to barcodes that broadcast their information, and the comparison is apt in the sense that the tiny devices have been used mainly for identifying parts and inventory, including cattle, as they make their way through supply chains.

And, of course, to the corps and "our" government, we are cattle.

Very little security is built into the tags themselves, and existing laws offer people scant protection from being surreptitiously tracked and profiled while living an increasingly tagged life.

There is an important difference, however, between other nations’ RFID-based ID cards and Homeland Security’s new driver’s licenses. Most countries’ contactless national IDs and e-passports have adopted an RFID tag that meets an industry standard known as ISO 14443, which was developed specifically for identification and payment cards and has a degree of security and privacy protection built in. In contrast, U.S. border cards use an RFID standard known as EPCglobal Gen 2, a technology that was designed to track products in warehouses, where the goal is not security but maximum ease of readability.

Whereas the ISO 14443 standard includes rudimentary encryption and requires tags to be close to a scanner to be read (a distance measured in inches rather than feet), Gen 2 tags typically have no encryption and only minimal data safeguards. To skim the data from an encrypted ISO 14443 chip, you have to crack the encryption code, but no special skills are required to skim a Gen 2 tag; all you need is any Gen 2 reader. Such readers can be purchased readily and are in common use in warehouses worldwide. A hacker or criminal armed with one could skim a border card through a purse, across a room, even through a wall.

What I said. The ISO standard was designed to protect people. The United States standards treats people like product. Just like the "health" "care" system, if it comes to that. More:

If the idea that corporations might want to use RFID tags to spy on individuals sounds far-fetched, it is worth considering an IBM patent filed in 2001 and granted in 2006. The patent describes exactly how the cards can be used for tracking and profiling even if access to official databases is unavailable or strictly limited. Entitled “Identification and Tracking of Persons Using RFID-Tagged Items in Store Environments,” it chillingly details RFID’s potential for surveillance in a world where networked RFID readers called “person tracking units” would be incorporated virtually everywhere people go—in “shopping malls, airports, train stations, bus stations, elevators, trains, airplanes, restrooms, sports arenas, libraries, theaters, [and] mu se ums”—to closely monitor people’s movements.

According to the patent, here is how it would work in a retail environment: an “RFID tag scanner located [in the desired tracking location]... scans the RFID tags on [a] person.... As that person moves around the store, different RFID tag scanners located throughout the store can pick up radio signals from the RFID tags carried on that person and the movement of that person is tracked based on these detections.... The person tracking unit may keep records of different locations where the person has visited, as well as the visitation times.”

The fact that no personal data are stored in the RFID tag does not present a problem, IBM explains, because “the personal information will be obtained when the person uses his or her credit card, bank card, shopper card or the like.” The link between the unique RFID number of the tag and a person’s identity needs to be made only once for the card to serve as a proxy for the person thereafter. Although IBM envisioned tracking people via miniature tags in consumer goods, with today’s RFID border cards there is no need to wait for such individual product tags to become widespread. Washington’s new driver’s licenses would be ideally suited to the in-store tracking application, because they can already be read by Gen 2 inventory scanners in use today at stores such as Wal-Mart, Dillard’s and American Apparel.

Why are we crapping around? Why not just insert the RFID under the skin at birth?

0
No votes yet

Comments

myiq2xu's picture
Submitted by myiq2xu on

our skins at birth? That would be even simpler.

There could be a symbol, visible under ultraviolet light, tattooed on the skin.

On the right hand, or forehead.

------------------------------------------------
“When someone engages in divisive behavior, any resulting division is their responsibility” - Melissa McEwan

Truth Partisan's picture
Submitted by Truth Partisan on

microchips for planting under the skin of children--
also pets--for sale on the internet.
Do they cause tumors or is that a myth?

bringiton's picture
Submitted by bringiton on

How do you know it isn't being done already? You know that little clicking noise you hear sometimes but can never quite identify? That will be your chip, downloading to the mothership.

But seriously, no, I mean it, seriously, the way to defeat these kinds of things, as we discussed before when talking about cell phone tracking, is to wrap the damn cell phone or passport or drivers license in

- wait for it -

tin foil.

What could be easier. I suggest that the very first Corrente/PB2.0 promotional product should be a tin foil sheet covered in knitted hemp fiber, made into a pocket suitable for covering a passport, a phone or a wallet. Protection from prying Big Brother spies, plus the added benefit of being able to smoke it if things get too depressing.

Submitted by lambert on

Sorry I missed it before.

NOTE Little clicking sound? Mine's more like a chirp or a warble. Different telcos, maybe?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

bringiton's picture
Submitted by bringiton on

Wow, you got the new unit, the one with the high speed transmission capability. Their only downside is the unfortunate tendency for surrounding plant life to develop mildew...oh, wait....

No need to say sorry, for heaven's sakes. You have better things to do than follow me around all day. Come to think of it, I have better things to do too; unfortunately, out-of-body experiences are not my forte.

Submitted by lambert on

Good to know. I'd been concerned.

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.