Home

2004 election

It's important to distinguish 'possible' from 'probable'

Sat, 11/01/2008 - 8:41am — DCblogger

Documents reveal how Ohio routed 2004 voting data through company that hosted external Bush Administration email accounts

In an affidavit filed in September, Spoonamore asserted that "any time all information is directed to a single computer for consolidation, it is possible… that single computer will exploit the information for some purpose. ... In the case of Ohio 2004, the only purpose I can conceive for sending all county vote tabulations to a GOP managed Man-in-the-Middle site in Chattanooga before sending the results onward to the Sec. of State, would be to hack the vote at the MIM."

 Read more…
»

All Day, Every Day

Mon, 06/19/2006 - 12:54am — chicago dyke

I can post this kind of thing. I know, it's just a report from someone on the ground with legal training and election experience talking to those who actually saw the tampering that was going on, so we shouldn't pay any attention to it at all. Kennedy was wrong about thimerisol* after all, so who cares?

 Read more…
»