If you have "no place to go," come here!

Surveillance Funtime at Davos: ATT Promises More to Come

chicago dyke's picture

All your social networking belong to us:

DAVOS, Switzerland - AT&T Inc. is still evaluating whether to examine traffic on its Internet lines to stop illegal sharing of copyright material, its chief executive said Wednesday.

CEO Randall Stephenson told a conference at the World Economic Forum that the company is looking at monitoring peer-to-peer file-sharing networks, one of the largest drivers of online traffic but also a common way to illegally exchange copyright files.

"It's like being in a store and watching someone steal a DVD. Do you act?" Stephenson asked.

AT&T has talked about such plans since last summer. They represent a break with the current practice of U.S. Internet service providers, who are shielded by law from liability if their subscribers trade copyright files like movies.

Stephenson said he still sees value in peer-to-peer networks despite some problems. The networks are increasingly used for legally distributed files like movie trailers and software.

Comcast Corp., the second largest U.S. Internet provider after AT&T, has chosen another way to deal with the congestion caused by file-sharers, by hampering some peer-to-peer traffic regardless of whether the content is legal.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission said earlier this month it would investigate complaints from consumer groups and legal scholars that Comcast's practice violates the open access principles of the Internet.

Your Panopticon PC needs your attention, Citizen. For your Protection, of course. Please report to it immediately and submit all your most personal information. Just hit the keys, we'll do the rest.

No votes yet


Submitted by [Please enter a... (not verified) on

... and if they stop being common carriers, don't they become liable for all sorts of crimes evidenced through the messages and files carried on their networks? Are they sure they want to do this, because they haven't managed to kill all the lawyers yet, and there must be a few grieving families who'll be glad to sue them for not stopping the communications that led to organized crime executions -- hell, if they subpoena the government's wiretapping of the criminals, they could be found liable not for their warrantless wiretapping, but for the crimes they failed to *prevent* because they cooperated in wiretapping.

Either way, Ma Bell is weeping for her deviant, corrupt children, wondering where she went wrong instilling the values of an old-fashioned monopoly....

Submitted by [Please enter a... (not verified) on

if the families subpoena the government’s wiretapping of the criminals, the government could be found liable...