Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

Skepticism on Dylann Roof's "manifesto" and website

I saw the story of Dylann Roof's website break on my Twitter feed this morning, and in a just a few hours it's in the New York Times. The site contains images of Roof, as well as a manifesto in text. Here's the text (icky). Here's an image (icky):

I've taught college undergraduates. If there are no misspellings in this text -- and on a quick scan, I found none -- then Roof, a high-school dropout, didn't write it.

The manifesto is also very well-written, for what it is; I'd want to see a writing sample from Roof, possibly from his high school English teacher, before I concluded Roof wrote it.

So I wonder then, if not Roof, who? Could he simply have appropriate some other racist's work? Well, I Google for phrases from the Manifesto, and I don't find any hits other than this. So who wrote it?

The Times is right to be skeptical:

It is not clear who wrote the words and who took the pictures, but the manifesto appears to trace the evolution of the author’s racist worldview and concludes with a section labeled “An Explanation.

If there's one thing we've learned over the past few years, it's that "Internet evidence is not evidence," because it's too easy to alter or even manufacture it. Provenance is key. So while the site may be authentic, and the pictures may be authentic, there's one big piece of the site that doesn't look authentic at all.

NOTE We might also ask if Roof (high school dropout) had site-building skills. A view source shows the site was built with "Parallels Presence Builder 12.0.7":

Parallells Presence Builder, say the Release Notes is a "software suite for hosting providers." In other words, it's not software that Roof would buy shrink-wrapped from Amazon. However, the hosting provider might make it available to its clients, so let's go find out who hosts Roof's site.

CAVEAT: Again, Internet evidence is not evidence. The data I am about to go looking for could be spoofed, could have been changed between this morning and this afternoon, or between the time the domain was purchased and today, or it could be disguised in some way, perhaps even by Roof's previous provider, to avoid stress on their own serves. Who knows? That said:

We ping "Last Rhodesians" and get the IP address:

Having the IP address, we get the host through a reverse IP lookup:

Having the host, wpl6.hosting.reg.ru, we go there. (After all, it could be in English; I use Yandex, a Russian site, and it has an English version.)

You can look for yourself, but if there's an English version of this site, I missed the link to it. Finally, just for grins, we look to where Roof's nameservers are (https://www.reg.ru/) which we have from the whois above:

Russian again, with no English version.

Now, see again the Caveat above. I don't think this little excursion proves much, except for one thing: The provenance of the site is unclear, and it needs to be shown that Roof actually created it. Somebody with more resources than I have should look into this.

UPDATE The Times story also says:

A friend of Mr. Roof’s, Jacob Meek, 15, said the references to the Trayvon Martin case made clear that Mr. Roof had written the essay. “That’s his website,” he said. “He wrote it, and I just can tell.”

Maybe. I'd like to hear from Roof's English teacher, because Meek strikes me as not the sharpest tool in the drawer (and speech is not writing).

The Times goes on:

Benjamin Wareing, a blogger in Britain, said the writings were nearly identical to blog entries that Mr. Roof posted several months ago on a Tumblr page. Mr. Wareing was preparing to write an essay on the dangers of Tumblr and troubled youths, so he took notes on the writings.

Which might be dispositive, if there were link to Wareing's material (apparently, Roof's Tumblr has been deleted). If this is the same Wareing (WordPress, not Tumblr), he blogs for commission. And I still want to know who the webhost is!

UPDATE Parallels is used by bottom feeding hosting providers like HostGator and others, so it's not implausible that Roof's host used it. But I still want to know who the host is!

UPDATE And I was right to be skeptical. Hat tip to alert reader Cujo359 in comments:

This just went up at the Waering WP site:

I wanted to perform a little experiment with the help of my friend, Sadrak Ramirez, to see how easily one can change the outcome of global news reaching every corner of Earth. Our target; Dylann Storm – The Charleston Shooter.

How I Screwed With The Biggest News Outlet in The World

So, says Waering:

Lets give an example; I told her that Dylann Roof had some ‘elusive’ and mysterious Tumblr page in which he posted his deepest thoughts. Without providing any screenshots or ANY proof of its existence other than my own word, the reporter published it as fact. Oops.

Indeed.

So, one of the two pieces of supposedly confirming evidence that Roof wrote the Manifesto is gone. The other piece is Meek, friend of Roof, saying "I just can tell." Oh-k-a-a-a-y.

So what next? And couldn't the Times have placed a call to Roof's English teacher?

AttachmentSize
roof.png584.74 KB
roof_website.png299.21 KB
ping.png41.45 KB
reverse_lookup.png81.48 KB
host.png179.14 KB
nameservers.png653.99 KB
0
No votes yet
Updated: 

Comments

Submitted by lambert on

Tinfoil weakens over time and must be replaced!

I mean, one, the Russians wouldn't be dumb enough to use a Russian website, so it's somebody else.

I dunno. Could be nothing, but I don't like loose ends like this.

Submitted by Paul_Lukasiak on

If the manifesto proves to be fraudulent (as in, not written or posted by Roof), expect the right wing media to focus on that fact, and act as if the existence of faked evidence of racism means that racism was not a factor. The rest of the evidence won't matter (trust me, I know this particular subject ;) ), all that will matter is that some evidence was supposedly faked.

Submitted by lambert on

The press seems to be running with the story, so we'll see. I'm sort of amazed to see "Internet evidence" taken seriously.

Cujo359's picture
Submitted by Cujo359 on

Google translate yielded this from the reg.us company page:

Special services and conditions of REG.RU
Facilities and Services

Each of our clients can take advantage of a wide range of services and the most advanced services to create projects of any complexity. In REG.RU presents a unique opportunity for the registration and sale of domain names, hosting a variety of tariff plans, large variety of virtual servers and physical servers VPS Dedicated; cloud services, SSL-certificates from the world's leading companies, as well as designers of sites, ready-made solutions on popular CMS and all the necessary for a network of web-based tools. We constantly introduce new products and services, as well as additional related services that allows customers to receive REG.RU most comprehensive range of services to create your own website or online business and its protection.

They also claim to be one of the biggest hosting companies in Russia. It's quite likely that if Roof did use their services, it was provided by some third party. Who that might be I have no idea, especially since he seems to have been a loner. Perhaps some white supremacist network or online service?

And yes, it would be interesting to hear from his teachers whether he had ever shown that much verbal ability.

Cujo359's picture
Submitted by Cujo359 on

This just went up at the Waering WP site:

I wanted to perform a little experiment with the help of my friend, Sadrak Ramirez, to see how easily one can change the outcome of global news reaching every corner of Earth. Our target; Dylann Storm – The Charleston Shooter.

How I Screwed With The Biggest News Outlet in The World

Of course, skepticism is warranted here, too, but at least this account sounds more plausible than what you read in the NYT.

Submitted by lambert on

... the Times should never have gone with this source. And I even sent the reporter a polite note, via the contact form (and not, to be polite, and via the Twitter, which I now regret).

Thanks for this link. The wording post is hedged about with qualifications, because I really don't want to seem foily, but... Wow. Worse than I even imagined.