Perpetuating the public option hoax
Primary tabs
There is no public option.
Chris Bowers
We have been counting votes here on Open Left. With the addition of Senator Inoyue this morning, there are now 25 Senators on the record as favoring passing a public option through reconciliation. Tom Carper is about ready to make it 26. Six are opposed, and six others are likely supporters.
Since there is no proposed legislative language, there is no public option and these Senators have not made any pledge that they can be held accountable for. When you are working for legislation you must first have legislation to work for. That not a single senator has proposed public option language is a strong sign that the whole thing is a wild goose chase.
Now I can see how in January of 2009 people could have fallen for this. After all, we all know that you usually have to start small and work your way to something big, so going after the public option instead of what you really want makes intuitive sense.
But at this late date to continue to lead readers down the garden path is wrong. Just fundamentally wrong. The country wants Medicare for All, only Versailles wants an insurance company bail out. Netroots could be rallying their readers against a monstrous attack on our collective purse to bail out a bunch of parasites with a failing business model. Instead they insist on doing vote counts for mythical legislation.

- DCblogger's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Maybe we should just start referring to the
public option as "Harvey," the 6-foot rabbit that only Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart) could see...
From imdb.com
So...if the public option is "Harvey," then that would make Chris Bowers...Elwood?
not a bad idea
but there are too many Elwood's
As best I recall the movie
Elwood didn't profit and aggrandize himself by denying lifesaving medical and economic relief -- and honest discourse -- to countless people. But I haven't seen it in a while...
No, but he kept insisting Harvey
was there, and he was the only one who could see it.
I think we're more in "Emperor's New Clothes" territory
Almost everyone can "see" it, even though it just ain't there.
I saw the movie recently...
and Harvey was real. He opened doors, lifted gates and changed text in a dictionary. Also, Elwood's psychiatrist ended up being able to see him.
Elwood was one of the only ones who could see Harvey because Harvey was a mischievous spirit, not because Harvey didn't exist.
Seems to me we are the Elwoods, single-payer is Harvey, and the "public option" pushers are the ones who can't see him.
Maybe so...
It's been a while since I've seen the movie, so my comparison probably suffered for it.
Kind of ironic, isn't it, that closing one's eyes allows one to see something that isn't there (PO) and prevents one from seeing something that is (SP).
If only FDL
...would recognize this. I spent most of tonight battling PO people who have been indoctrinated by the editors' obsessive focus!
FDL, OL, MoveOn and those who take their cues from them...
... have indoctrinated pretty much the entire left half of the nation.
When even Glenn won't call a spade a spade, we're well and truly fucked.
Reality will provide sufficient therapy
No doubt.
Uwe Reihardt on On Point Tues was brutal about Reality--
He said several times that without real reform (and his ideas of reform are not Medicare for All, afaik) American middle class will be impoverished by health care costs and lose their standard of living.
Now, truth time: I was watching the annotated rebroadcast of last week's Lost, so caught only a bit of the program.
Guests:
Potter was much harder on the BHIPs (Big Health Insurance Parasites) than Reinhardt, of course.
Audio for program here. Can't find transcript, but comments are interesting and, uh, diverse.
"real reform" is one of those phrases to watch for...
... since nobody knows what "real reform" means. Heck, the shills for the so-called "public option" called their preferred policy "real reform."
As for Uwe Reinhardt....
T/U for the link to Hipparchia's analysis of Reinhardt--Loove
Hipparchia!
Worth rereading.
And I remain convinced
that the "health care economics experts" Krugman has been listening to (so he remains convinced that even the Senate bill would be better than nothing) consist of his Princeton colleague Uwe Reinhardt and... Uwe Reinhardt.
And some interesting information about Krugman's personal/political history in the New Yorker (h/t campskunk at Alegre's place)