Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

NOW: Obamacare genuflects to the bishops, is pro-coat hanger, and permits age- and gender-rating

Other than that, it's a "historic" "progressive" victory, which we must immediately begin work to improve, so send more money to "progressives" immediately! They really need it!

Violet quotes NOW:

Fact: The bill contains a sweeping anti-abortion provision. Contrary to the talking points circulated by congressional leaders, the bill passed today ultimately achieves the same outcome as the infamous Stupak-Pitts Amendment, namely the likely elimination of all private as well as public insurance coverage for abortion. It imposes a bizarre requirement on insurance plan enrollees who buy coverage through the health insurance exchanges to write two monthly checks (one for an abortion care rider and one for all other health care). Even employers will have to write two separate checks for each of their employees requesting the abortion rider.

This burdensome, elaborate system must be eliminated. It is there because the Catholic bishops and extremist abortion rights opponents know that it will result in greatly restricting access to abortion care, currently one of the most common medical procedures for women.

Fact: President Obama made an eleventh-hour agreement to issue an executive order lending the weight of his office to the anti-abortion measures included in the bill. This move was designed to appease a handful of anti-choice Democrats who have held up health care reform in an effort to restrict women’s access to abortion. This executive order helps to cement the misconception that the Hyde Amendment is settled law rather than what it really is — an illegitimate tack-on to an annual must-pass appropriations bill. It also sends the outrageous message that it is acceptable to negotiate health care reform on the backs of women.

Fact: The bill permits age-rating, the practice of imposing higher premiums on older people. This practice has a disproportionate impact on women, whose incomes and savings are lower due to a lifetime of systematic wage discrimination.

Fact: The bill also permits gender-rating, the practice of charging women higher premiums simply because they are women. Some are under the mistaken impression that gender-rating has been prohibited, but that is only true in the individual and small-group markets. Larger group plans (more than 100 employees) sold through the exchanges will be permitted to discriminate against women — having an especially harmful impact in workplaces where women predominate.

I guess it's clear enough who rates a pony and who doesn't. Now that Obama has done Reagan's work on abortion, I imagine it's time for him to move on and do Reagan's work on Medicare and Social Security. And the career "progressives" will be cheering him on.

NOTE Thank The God(ess)(e)(s) Of Your Choice, If Any, that NOW got rid of the Obama fans in the leadership who were causing NOW's membership and finances to collapse. The current leadership is talking sense.

0
No votes yet

Comments

madamab's picture
Submitted by madamab on

They are supporting Stupak's challenger.

They're doing very well...with some straying and backsliding along the way. But hey, who hasn't done that?

Submitted by jawbone on

the Supreme Court and Repub appointed Federal judiciary hobbled FDR's early New Deal legislation (which led to his court packing -- which was within his purview to propose, he just kinda sorta hid his real reason for adding more judges to both the SC and the Fed bench and that struck even supporters as wrong.)

I think the Roberts Court would be loath take away such a big present to the BHIPs, and I bet they could find a way to not apply the ERA to women's reproductive health.

Hell, they might even use it to kill Roe. I wouldn't put it beyond John Roberts.