Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

Monday Mourning

madamab's picture

I write this at almost 11 pm on Sunday night, the eve of the historically historic vote on the giant clusterfuck I call the Health Whatever Bill. So far, we have seen ample evidence of the fact that the the Democrats will do anything at all to get those all-important House votes; so, despite my not knowing for sure, I have no doubt that it will pass with the Stupakian Executive Order included. For those who have not read it yet, et voila:

Executive Order

- – - – - – -

ensuring enforcement and implementation of abortion restrictions in the patient protection and affordable care act

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (approved March ­­__, 2010), I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Policy.

Following the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”), it is necessary to establish an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish a comprehensive, government-wide set of policies and procedures to achieve this goal and to make certain that all relevant actors—Federal officials, state officials (including insurance regulators) and health care providers—are aware of their responsibilities, new and old.

The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.

Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

Section 2. Strict Compliance with Prohibitions on Abortion Funding in Health Insurance Exchanges. The Act specifically prohibits the use of tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments to pay for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) in the health insurance exchanges that will be operational in 2014. The Act also imposes strict payment and accounting requirements to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services in exchange plans (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) and requires state health insurance commissioners to ensure that exchange plan funds are segregated by insurance companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, OMB funds management circulars, and accounting guidance provided by the Government Accountability Office.

I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act’s segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance. The guidelines shall also offer technical information that states should follow to conduct independent regular audits of insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchanges. In developing these model guidelines, the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS shall consult with executive agencies and offices that have relevant expertise in accounting principles, including, but not limited to, the Department of the Treasury, and with the Government Accountability Office. Upon completion of those model guidelines, the Secretary of HHS should promptly initiate a rulemaking to issue regulations, which will have the force of law, to interpret the Act’s segregation requirements, and shall provide guidance to state health insurance commissioners on how to comply with the model guidelines.

Section 3. Community Health Center Program.

The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program. Existing law prohibits these centers from using federal funds to provide abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), as a result of both the Hyde Amendment and longstanding regulations containing the Hyde language. Under the Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds for Community Health Centers under section 10503 and all other relevant provisions. I hereby direct the Secretary of HHS to ensure that program administrators and recipients of Federal funds are aware of and comply with the limitations on abortion services imposed on CHCs by existing law. Such actions should include, but are not limited to, updating Grant Policy Statements that accompany CHC grants and issuing new interpretive rules.

Section 4. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) authority granted by law or presidential directive to an agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This Executive Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.

THE WHITE HOUSE

Huh. Turns out there is a way to ban abortion without overturning Roe v. Wade after all: you just make it impossible for women to afford it and penalize providers by decimating their clientele and making their procedures more expensive. It's all unfolding exactly as many of us said it would, as we knew it would over a year ago.

I just want to leave you with this thought: Suppose men were told that the cost of condoms and wellness exams for their naughty bits would no longer be covered by their insurance companies if their insurance companies took any federal monies whatsoever to defray any costs? And suppose they were told there would be no cost controls whatsoever, so that their now-uncovered (heh) naughty-bit care and condoms could be as expensive as the insurance companies wanted it to be? Say, $100/box for a condom, and $1000 - $2000 for a prostate exam or a vasectomy?

Do you think that men would say, "Sure, that's fine. Anything for health care reform. Sis boom bah, rah rah rah, gooooo, Democrats?"

Or would they say, "Are you all fucking insane? Hey, don't count on our votes ever again."

It's official, folks: Neither the Dems nor the Repubs are now actually pro-choice; thus, there is no reason for any pro-choice person to support either Party. So I say, support pro-choice challengers (like Connie Saltonstall) to these spineless, corporate, fundiegelical pseudoDems who are pretending to be public servants, and do whatever you can to make people aware that you are not, not, NOT okay with this, and it's fucking insulting that people would ever ask you to be.

My reproductive rights are not negotiable.

0
No votes yet

Comments

BDBlue's picture
Submitted by BDBlue on

Otherwise those big, bad Republicans are going to take away your right to choose.

And what a bunch of useless people those women in Congress are. Emily's List should be ashamed of the crew whose elections they helped fund. What is the point of all of that if they are going to vote for the bill knowing that there's going to be this executive order.

I am done with the Democratic Party. Done. I don't even care if the "good" ones win anymore. The "good" ones all went along with this.

But remember, according to Ms., Obama is what a feminist looks like.

Useless and corrupt, all of 'em.

Valhalla's picture
Submitted by Valhalla on

the bad ones. Are there any good ones left?

I'm 100% with you.

Andd we need a new term for these Vichy feminists. Oh, maybe that's it.

three wickets's picture
Submitted by three wickets on

But I like it!! Vichy feminists. Because I've been using the term collaborators.

Submitted by hipparchia on

i've used coathanger dems before, and now i'm going to add vichy feminists to my vocabulary.

Submitted by hipparchia on

Suppose men were told that the cost of condoms and wellness exams for their naughty bits would no longer be covered by their insurance companies if their insurance companies took any federal monies whatsoever to defray any costs?

men get wellness exams for this? who knew? i thought they all waited until things stop working entirely.

as for the condoms, they'd just tell women if you don't want to get pregnant, buy your own condoms.

madamab's picture
Submitted by madamab on

men get wellness exams for this? who knew? i thought they all waited until things stop working entirely.

Prostate exams and vasectomies is what I was thinking about...but hey, whaddo I know - I don't have the equipment! ;-)

as for the condoms, they'd just tell women if you don't want to get pregnant, buy your own condoms.

Um, women don't HAVE to have sex with guys who don't buy their own condoms. I don't think that would go over too well. ;-)

But the point was, I doubt that if the Dems insisted on that language in the bill, that men would feel obligated to support it, or the Party.

Submitted by hipparchia on

i was obliquely and snarkily suggesting that anti-choice men possibly don't care about these particular topics any more than they care about women's rights.

note to self: must hone rapier wit

madamab's picture
Submitted by madamab on

must drink coffee before reading hipparchia ;-)

Submitted by hipparchia on

tea, chocolate, ice cream: the 4 basic food groups

madamab's picture
Submitted by madamab on

coffee and chocolate work for me! :-)

three wickets's picture
Submitted by three wickets on

I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act’s segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance.

Women are now "segregated." Unfortunate choice of words, Mr President.

Kick Baucus to the curb's picture
Submitted by Kick Baucus to ... on

"Segregated" is the perfect choice of words. The Taliban has landed. While the media is still huffing hard over ALLEGED insults to gays and African-Americans, half the population is thrown under the bus without a whisper of protest - and by decree of the Emperor, no less. Just when I thought healthcare "reform" couldn't get any worse.

Submitted by libbyliberal on

But we clung to denial.... but this rips the blanket of denial out of our hands and lets us recognize how abandoned and rejected we seriously are.

And still the congratulatory kool-aid is being distributed.

I will make a printout of this to reread periodically for when the fog of denial comes after me.