Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

Massive Olbermann takedown

Scary smart....

I asked a friend today, a non-political friend, "If someone said Person X took Person Y into a room, and Person X came out alone, what do you think of?" She laughed and said "The Sopranos." The homicidal implication of the situation struck her immediately, and I didn't say what gender of the two people were or even hint that they might be at odds. All it took was the structure of one person taking another into a closed/secluded space and coming bacck alone for her to understand the deadly dynamic. My friend provided all the rest of the story. It is part of our common understanding, and we can shorthand the idea of retributive violence with the name of a popular TV show.

Part of my purpose was to deliver a dash of cold water and get readers to examine the resonance Olbermann's words would have had with listeners. You don't need to say "Kill the bitch" out loud if you can get people to provide the narrative in their own heads. My husband, who thinks I'm a bit extreme and started this electoral cycle as an Obama supporter, "got it" the second I read it to him yesterday. You also can't explicitly say those words because, well, the Secret Service will be all over your ass. Trust me, the guys and gals with the lapel pins and the serious expressions know exactly what Olbermann said. They also know the danger is not Olbermann himself but the person who "gets it" and (unlike the commenters here, even those who don't want Hillary for Pres.) thinks it is a peachy idea, not a horrific one. Plausible deniability has many applications.

I might be swayed by the hyperbole excuse save for the weeks of public statements by Olbermann of increasing incivility and threat, particularly when placed in the context of the hate-laced aggression of his fellow celebrity talking heads, and even more so when one takes into account Olbermann's involvement with Daily Kos, where threats of violence against Hillary are de rigeur. His language fits right into that setting, and did not shock or alarm his buddies whatsoever. They did not find it hyperbolic. It sounded normal to them. This was not Kanye West bursting out with "Bush doesn't care about black people!" after watching the suffering after Katrina. This was business as usual for Olbermann and Co.

It wasn't about Obama and Hillary in an election match because it was part of Olbermann's rant that Hillary should stop contesting with Obama and just quit. The context was if she would not quit on her own, someone should take that decision out of her hands - by violence. It was his answer to the question WWTSBQ? Obama has not been able to knock her out, take her down, put an end to her, terminate her, finish her off. That's the problem. Thus a super delegate who has the testicular fortitude to take on the bitch needs to hustle her into the next room and make sure she doesn't come back out.

She's right. And if the wording was transposed for Obama, everybody would "get it" immediately, and the fainting couches would be instantly filled with prostrate Villagers and the Boiz.

0
No votes yet

Comments

amberglow's picture
Submitted by amberglow on

to keep doing this kind of thing, even after Shuster and Matthews--they haven't learned a thing.

BDBlue's picture
Submitted by BDBlue on

See Melissa McEwan for Jack Cafferty's latest. It's amazing how politics turns violent for so many of these guys when Hillary Clinton is involved.

I've said it before, I'll say it again, I almost feel sorry for guys like Olbermann and Josh Marshall and so many others. We all have unpleasant thoughts and fears, but most of us manage to keep that deep psychological stuff under wraps. These guys not only put it on display for everyone to see, they don't seem to realize they're putting it on display (as when KO asked Hillary if any criticism of her was sexist?). It's like seeing someone with his pants around his ankles when he thinks everything's just fine.