If you have "no place to go," come here!

Looks like I got a Hanoi Snowden scenario partly right

WaPo, today:

Ecuadorean officials have said publicly they cannot start considering Snowden’s asylum request until he arrives either in Ecuador or in an Ecuadorean embassy.

Two government officials [which government] with direct knowledge of the negotiations said Ecuador had been making detailed plans to receive and host Snowden.

One of the officials said those plans had been thwarted by Russia’s refusal to let Snowden leave or be picked up by Ecuadorean officials. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the case by name.

Snowden intended to travel from Moscow with the intention of going on to the Ecuadorean capital of Quito but after he was held up in the Moscow airport, Ecuador asked Russia to let him take a commercial flight to meet Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino in Vietnam or Singapore, where Patino was on a pre-planned official trip, in order to be taken back to Quito by Patino, the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak to the press.

The Russians rejected Ecuador’s requests to let Snowden leave Moscow, or to let an Ecuadorean government plane pick him up there, the official said.

So, interesting.

If Putin says Snowden is free to go, why can't he go?

NOTE Granted, I thought Snowden would to Hanoi by sea from Hong Kong. But Hanoi!

No votes yet


Rainbow Girl's picture
Submitted by Rainbow Girl on

Re "If Putin says Snowden is free to go, why can't he go?"

At least if you believe the report's sources reporting on sources from the Ecuadorian government that Putin is the one who put sticks in the wheels of Snowden's journey to Quito or to Vietnam, etc.