This inquiring mind would like to know.

Talk about burying the lead. In paragraph 31 of a 31 paragraph article, the Baltimore Sun's Siobhan Gorman shares this tidbit:

Current and former intelligence officials credit employees at the working level for innovating and passing along information in spite of bureaucratic limitations.

Um, I'd like to know a little bit more about what these employees consider "innovative."

After all, we know that Bush committed over 30 felonies when implementing his warrantless surveillance program, which Judge Jackson has ruled both unconstitutional and illegal. And the fish rots from the head, as we saw in Abu Ghraib, where Bush destroyed the chain of command and accountability for his own plausible deniability on torture.

So, if a felony isn't a "bureaucratic limitation," what on earth is?

And could these "innovations" be "politically explosive"?

Could these "innovations" be ratfucking?

Do these innovations involve Bush personally? Remember when the administration had scrambled jets to intercept a fucking Cessna light plane? (here) And Bush wasn't (we are told) informed? However, as a Kossack dug up, Bush was riding his bike in Patuxent Park right next to Fort Meade, the NSA's home. So, was Bush making a run for Unka Karl, picking up the latest hot stuff on Harry Reid? (Note that standard practice with NSA intercepts is to hand carry them to be read and not retained. This makes some sort of meet necessary. Hence Bush's bike ride.) Foily, I know, but when the going gets tough, the tough get foily...

It would be irresponsible not to speculate....