If you have "no place to go," come here!

Flexian infestations at the DCCC and Emily's List

Sheesh, this is just awful. From Down with Tyranny:

Right after the 2010 midterms we tried to explain some of the DCCC's most corrupt practices; you should read it because it will help you understand how, uncorrected, everything has gotten worse and worse. So much worse that the DCCC is essentially ineffective at doing it's core job of reelecting Democratic incumbents and electing Democratic challengers. Last cycle-- with President Obama sweeping up and the DSCC winning every impossible race on the table-- the DCCC failed miserably to win back the House. And this cycle, the corruption guarantees that Steve Israel will go down in history as the worst DCCC chairman ever.

Of course, the DCCC isn't the only center of perverse corruption bringing down the Democratic Party. EMILY's List is at least as bad. Although basically every Democratic woman candidate is petrified to speak publicly about EMILY's List's shenanigans, I've heard from candidate after candidate the same exact details for years. For example, when EMILY's List "suggests" that the candidates they raise money for hire The New Media, Inc., not everyone is aware that that firm's president, Tierney Hunt is the wife of EMILY's List Campaigns Director Jonathan Parker. The money EMILY's List demands cannot be spent on something useful-- like a field operation-- but must be wasted on a lame Beltway firm is going to personally enrich an EMILY's List executive. It's how EMILY's List killed the campaigns this year of Alex Sink, Wendy Greuel and Eloise Reyes. Several despairing candidates have said to me that they are forced to sit on the phone all day begging for money and that all the money winds up in the pockets of utterly worthless consultants they are forced to hire. And then they lose.

Candidates who depend on commercial operations like the DCCC and EMILY's List are putting their careers into the hands of pernicious professional consultants, the bane of American politics.

[Y]ou get self-interested staffers at the DCCC and EMILY's guiding you into their arms, gently-- unless you resist. If you resist, you are threatened and forced to hire the consultants. This is how one Member of Congress put it: "High-priced DC consultants go to work for the DCCC, and then again become high-priced DC consultants, usually pollsters or media consultants. While at the DCCC, they 'recommend' (i.e., insist) that candidates seeking DCCC support use their old firms, or the firms to which they plan to go. This results in several fundamental problems: (1) The DCCC’s own money is wasted on shoddy work. (2) The candidates’ money is wasted on shoddy work. (3) Both kinds of money are spent, overwhelmingly, on work that gains 15% commissions, especially TV ads, rather than non-commissionable fieldwork, voter handouts, 'free media' and community events."

The problem with Democrats as a party is that they still think they're the good guys. They aren't.

No votes yet


jo6pac's picture
Submitted by jo6pac on

The problem with Democrats as a party is that they still think they're the good guys. They aren't


They have sold Main Street out with the evil thought that others are more evil than us. This has worked wonders with the sheeple. This doesn't end here but with the cast of the middle east of who's more evil the newest bright star on the so-called lame stream press. It doesn't end and Gödel's would be proud. The cycle-0-pathes continues.
Dinner time

albrt's picture
Submitted by albrt on

No, Gödel.

In every system you have to assume an unproven axiom.

In our system we are required to assume that even if Democrats are infinitely bad, Republicans are somehow worse.

Submitted by lambert on

Goebbels, Bernays, Rove and the Eternal Golden Braid....

jo6pac's picture
Submitted by jo6pac on

Yes, failed my spelling test after a few glasses of wine. Thanks All:)

quixote's picture
Submitted by quixote on

The important thing is what you meant. And you are right!