Fifty-Four Forty-Three: Obama's Home Court Catastrophe in NY-9
Primary tabs
The election results in NY-9 are a rejection of Obama.
Fifty-four percent. That's the number of people who disapprove of Barack Obama's handling of his job as president in NY-9 and the margin by which the Republican won in that district.
This is a rejection of the DNC, the DCCC, the DSCC, and by extension, Obama's political mishandling.
Weprin was hand-picked. This candidate was selected by the DCCC for that district. This is the person that Barack Obama and Steve Israel and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz wanted to run with. Another hopelessly compromised, wishy washy, ineffectual, corporatist, DLC weenie. And remember: Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz, and Obama didn't have to have this election. They didn't need to demand Weiner's resignation.
When grassroots activists and unions tried to get rid of Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Obama & Co. said that primarying their double talking, Republican-lite corporate shill loser candidate whose unpopular voting record and championing of tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires (Read: Walton family heirs) over and above each and every constituent in the State of Arkansas made her sure to lose like the losing loser she was, ended in her complete and humiliating defeat when voters chose a real Republican instead of a shit-for brains loser ninny pretending to be a Democrat loser Blanche Lincoln.
This isn't a canary in a coal mine. This is a congressional seat. The Democrats in positions of power don't have much of these to spare but they are hell bent on losing each and every one of these by continuing to propose cuts in Medicare, Food Stamps, and Social Security so that we can pay for Tax Cuts for Millionaires and Billionaires, Corporations, and Wars that Nobody Wants to Fight or Pay For Any More.
The White House can blame liberals and "the professional left" all they want, but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that is a pretty close approximation of the popular vote in the 2012 presidential election--
54 percent "Anybody but Obama, even Rick Perry"
43 percent "Unprincipled Pusillanimous Anti-FDR Democratic Party Catastrophe"

- Jay's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Don 't hold back, Jay. Tell us what you REALLY think.
As for the Dems, they're PAID to suck. Sucking is their job. They're a party of corporate getekeepers.
More of this to come -
You said:
This just shows us what a disaster that the Dem Elites in DC are -
Meanwhile over in La La Land at TPV this loss hasn't been mentioned at all and all DK can do is give a blow by blow of the event. No analysis at all. They did however mention that the Big O's approval rate in California is now below 50%.
When will folks start calling for Obama not to run again?
Turner attacked Weprin from the left on "saving" SocSec
and Medicare from...Obama's attempt to ruin them. Really. Now, how he votes will probably be quite different, but Obama has opened a huge hole in Democratic plans to pin SocSec/Medicare/Medicaid attacks on Republicans. I mean, who are voters going to believe? A Dem's claim that the Repubs are going after those programs? Or their lying eyes and ears seeing and hearing Obama going after those programs?
Toss in Obama's refusal to take strong action to save homes and create jobs, when he had both the House and the Senate, and sentient voters have a right to not believe what he's saying now as he goes into campaign (read bamboozlement) mode.
Also, conservative Orthodox Jews voted against Weprin because he voted FOR same sex marriage in the NY assembly.
By the way, I don't know if it's just WNYC referring to Weiner over and over as "disgraced former Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner," but every top of the hour news summary and election report I heard yesterday used those words. NPR, howver, in reporting on the Republican win in the NV district where Rep. Ensign resigned due to a sex scandal? No such phrasing appears....
Double standard much, NPR/PBS/WNYC?
Turner will now be used as proof that even safe Dem seats are at risk because of Obama. And R candidates will continue to lie, saying they're the true champions of saving SocSec and Medicare. And D candidates' protests will be overwhelmed by Obama's own words.
(I think Romney is on to something in calling out Perry on his statements against SocSec--he realizes it undermines the Republican game plan to lie about saving SS and Medicare. Perry is making that lying tactic less powerful.)
Brilliant, Pres. Obama. If you're actively trying to weaken and destroy a political party. The one which happens to be the party you used to gain office. Seems he has far, far different objectives than both his party's members and his party's voters.
What a terrible selection the Dems made for their presidential candidate. And if Obama's goal is to destroy the party, he will never step down from running for reelection. Getting as few Dems into Congress as possible is another major achievement for this stealth candidate and "transformative" president, and playing dog in the manger fits that plan to a T.
Heh, tranforming the Democratic Party into a confused and directionless true minority party --in a nation which supports its former principles!-- is truly "transformative."
May be less here than meets the eye, nationally anyway
Jawbone writes:
There's that and, though I haven't seen any exit poll data, going in this is the way it was looking:
I think President Obama's comments about the '67 borders might have proved decisive in this race. However, unless it all comes down to Florida and there's a close race down there, I don't see any Jewish blocs of voters determining the winner in the upcoming national election.
And, whereas Gov. Perry's Social Security comments might be doing ex-gov Romney some good as he takes on the far right favorite in the primaries they certainly make President Obama appear to be a champion of the program regardless of what he has been saying about the program -- for years. Obama's Gallup favorables are back up to 43% after dropping to 39% in the previous poll. I don't think that bounce is coming from his jobs speech. Rather, all of a sudden Obama is out in front of Romney in head to head polling and I think that's because of how jolting Perry's comments have been to people considering whether to vote Republican in 2012.
NV could be more important
As several commenters have pointed out, NY-9 isn't exactly representative.
That said, muscling out a popular incumbent, pouring DCCC money into the district, and then losing the seat really is a clusterfuck. Regardless of the precise pathway to fail, the Ds seem to be finding it.
And then claiming it's meaningless
Don't forget that last part, which is what D-apologists are doing today. If it was so meaningless, then why 1) force Weiner out in the first place, he was being redistricted; or 2) pour lots of money into the district to save it?
Obama isn't transforming
Obama isn't transforming what was clearly already a DLC ever rightward triangulating neoliberal, free trading, for profit health, anti labor, telco lover boy, war party to begin with... has been this way for decades.
Excellent post, Jay.
But he sure is transforming the image of the Dem Party --
People could feel there was large part of the DC Dems in Congress who weren't bought and sold by Wall Street and Big Money, but Obama and his forcing DC Dems to vote against the party's principles and historic achievements has made it almost painfully clear: People have next to no representatives to aid them in DC.
Alas.
that's all they got the race card
Subject: Black Agenda Report blames Hillary racism.
Claiming that the near 100% AA vote for Obama was a product of a white racist candidate forgetting to couch her bigotry in coded speech, BAR's Margaret Kimberley states:
There will be no Hillary Clinton claiming that Obama “Isn’t a Muslim, as far as I know,” or desperately stating that she is reaching out to the “good voters, the white voters.”
that's all they got
the race card
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content...
that's all they got
the race card:
First Lady Hails Students in Rally Against Racism -
http://articles.latimes.com/1997/dec/10/...
BAR is not an Obama site
They called their shot on Obama way before we did. Just saying.
I respect BAR
And yet please read Kimberley's words. Unfortunate that she pulls th race card even as she's criticizing Obama.
Is BAR up?
It's down when I go there.
Freedom Rider: Thinking
Freedom Rider: Thinking Post-Obama | Black Agenda Report
Here's the quote:
In 2012, Obama will not have a primary opponent. There will be no Hillary Clinton claiming that Obama “Isn’t a Muslim, as far as I know,” or desperately stating that she is reaching out to the “good voters, the white voters.” Every time Clinton displayed her ham handed inability to achieve the fine American art of being racist in code, Obama received a boost from black voters. Without Clinton, there is no one to give those voters an incentive to show their loyalty.
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content...
Best Monday morning quarterback analysis
The NYT New York City blog has the best rundown I've seen.
This really was a very, very local race, filled with personal vendettas and Brooklyn Dem machine power broking, and infighting. The district is a bizzare configuration, and guess what--it is slated to disappear in the next general election. So the winner of this race is destined to be a lame duck, one year Congresscritter.
It's really misleading to try to extrapolate anything about national political trends from this result. It amuses me to see so many people trying to do so.
This comment reminds me, in a way, of 2000
The common thread that I see here is "It should never have gotten to this point."
Just as with Gore, in 2000, "it should never have gotten to this point" in NY-9, and wouldn't have, if the national Ds hadn't put themselves and their candidate in a position for local factors to dictate the outcome.
Cyndy Kouril, who worked Dem races in NY 9, says it is Big O-
that Obama is disappointing so very many Dem voters, but there is also former mayor Koch pushing Turner as the Great Goy Savior of Israel. Koch also pushed austerity and paying down the debt, iirc.
CBS Evening News is playing the anti-Obama sentiment heavily this evening. Orthodox Jews upset with Obama's "treatment" of Israel (What? Just mentioning using 1967 borders to begin discussions is so bad?), along with Dems disappointed in Obama's lack of economically beneficial actions. I didn't catch CBS mentioning the internecine war among Dem leadership in the area.
A pollster interviewed on WNYC said it was not just Obama, and he put more importance on gay marriage and Israel as prompting the Orthodox Jewish community to vote for Turner.
NYC scuttlebutt about Dov Hikind vs. Weprin and The Loss--
From City Hall's Heard Around Town:
More from The Nation's Ben Adler.
, looks at the marriage issue as enabling opponents of marriage equality to continue attacking those who voted for it. This piece points out the Orthodox Jews in that area are Modern Orthodox, not Hasidic, meaning same sex marriage should not have been a big issue.
Yves on Queens (not Brooklyn)
Here: