Indeed, no Democrat has made a stronger play for union backing than -- Edwards: Since 2004, he has participated in more than 180 labor events -- including a hunger strike for immigrant janitors in Miami -- for twenty different unions. In 2006, while Clinton was burning through $30 million on her shoo-in re-election campaign in New York, Edwards was campaigning for initiatives to increase the minimum wage in six key states. While other candidates have little time for labor-hall rallies -- the PR firm of Clinton's chief strategist, Mark Penn, has actually engaged in union busting -- Edwards has made labor a central element of his anti-poverty campaign. On the stump, he calls collective bargaining the key to "making work pay" and lifting low-wage Americans out of poverty.
Hey, Hillary's still got union-busting Mark Penn strategerizing for her, right? Has anyone on the campaign trail asked her why? If Hillary does indeed take questions?
"This is a true commitment on his part," says Anna Burger, chair of the labor federation Change to Win. "He was doing this when there were no cameras watching him. We needed a spotlight on workers, and anything he could do to raise their profile, he was willing to do that. His special relationship with labor is forcing the other candidates to play catch-up."
Interesting.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Front page
Comments
Mark Penn Isn't The ONLY Reason I Oppose HRC
but he's a BIG one.
That ANY serious Democrat candidate would employ one such as he in ANY major way in their campaign is an index of the true regard with which said candidate holds the unions and the movement they arise from.
Only AFTER she rids herself of that baggage will HRC even become part of MY election calculus.
And even if she were to do so, EDWARDS would still be my first choice...
oh, and thank you for simplifying the addition problems...keep 'em in 3 digits, ok?