Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

ComCast Flunkies Deny Activists Seat

chicago dyke's picture
Thread: 

You prolly saw this already but it pissed me off and I need to blog on it. Goodwin can suck it; isn't this how the SA got started? Or at least, there's some rhyming going on here. It's never a good thing when an entrenched power rounds up bored, underemployed young men and stands them up in opposition to populists and progressives.

Comcast Blocking: First the Internet — Now the Public
February 25th, 2008 by jstearns
There was huge turnout at today’s public hearing in Boston on the future of the Internet. Hundreds of concerned citizens arrived to speak out on the importance of an open Internet. Many took the day off from work — standing outside in the Boston cold — to see the FCC Commissioners. But when they reach the door, they’re told they couldn’t come in.

The size of the crowd is evidence that many Americans don’t want giant corporations like Comcast and Verzion to decide what we can do and where we can go on the Internet.
But will the FCC hear these voices? For many people who showed up on time for the hearing, apparently not.

Comcast — or someone who really, really likes Comcast — evidently bused in its own crowd. These seat-warmers, were paid to fill the room, a move that kept others from taking part.

[Update: Comcast admits to paying people to stack the room in their favor. Read the report.]

They arrived en masse some 90 minutes before the hearing began and occupied almost every available seat, upon which many promptly fell asleep (picture above).

Comcast’s sleeper cell
One told us that he was “just getting paid to hold someone’s seat.”
He added that he had no idea what the meeting was about.

If he was holding someone else’s seat, he never gave it up.

Many of this early crowd had mysteriously matching yellow highlighters stuck in their lapels.

Comcast payoff
We also photographed them outside the venue being handed papers by an organizer who had been seen earlier talking with several of the Comcast people at the hearing.

Here’s why this is a problem. Comcast clearly paid disinterested people to fill seats. This barred interested citizens from entering.

More than 100 people who arrived at the appointed time for the hearing were turned away by campus police because the room was already full.

Barred: The interested public
The Cambridge hearing is part of the FCC’s ongoing investigation into Comcast’s blocking of Internet traffic. But there’s much more at stake. We are at a critical juncture, where it will be decided whether we have a closed Internet controlled by a small handful of giant corporations, or an open Internet controlled by the people who use it.

Comcast wants the former — to dictate which Web sites and services go fast, slow or don’t load at all. And they’re backed by the other would-be gatekeepers at AT&T, Verizon and Time Warner.

It's like union-busting, but reflective of the apathetic, drug-addled, couch potato nature of our times.

0
No votes yet

Comments

Submitted by Paul_Lukasiak on

I was gonna do a blog about this, but then got distracted...

But I recently received a mailing offering me much higher download rates for an extra $10 a month. Obviously, there are limitations to the tubes capacity, and comcast only promises me "up to 6kbps" (or whatever it is) and can't always deliver the maximum because of high traffic on their tubes. This attempt to create a two-tiered system means that there will be even less bandwidth for most Comcast users -- if they want to reduce available bandwidth for the average user, then they should drop the price for the average user in addition to charging more for the user who wants more bandwidth.

koshembos's picture
Submitted by koshembos on

Gratifying to see Obama's caucuses tactics taking over the private sector; overwhelm them with numbers.

Comcast is already postpartisan, new democracy. You can also call it the rule of the mobs.