Cases of swine flu seem to be vastly overstated
Via CBS:
If you've been diagnosed "probable" or "presumed" 2009 H1N1 or "swine flu" in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn’t have H1N1 flu.
In fact, you probably didn’t have flu at all. That's according to state-by-state test results obtained in a three-month-long CBS News investigation.
[...]The results reveal a pattern that surprised a number of health care professionals we consulted. The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu, despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1 flu, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico.
Holy Sneezing, Coughing, Feverish Piglets of Doom, Batman!
I've had the flu before, and as someone with chronic asthma problems, punctuated by the occasional bout of bronchitis or pneumonia to relieve the monotony, I'm always first in line for the flu shot du jour. Same for the swine flu shot/mist when it makes it to my town -- wild elephants will not be able to keep me away.
I'm truly baffled by people who would rather get the flu than suffer through a momentary jab with a miniscule sharpened object, but wev.
This, however, I did not know:
Breaking: British Columbia suspends seasonal flu shots over elevated swine risk
Department of Oh for Crying Out Loud:
The Vancouver Sun is reporting this AM that the province of British Columbia has formally called off seasonal flu shots, for all but the highest risk individuals -- on early reports of a Canadian study indicating a 50% increased risk of contracting H1N1 in subjects who received a seasonal shot, over those that did not.

More details here.
- koan's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page

Recent comments
4 min 58 sec ago
5 min 8 sec ago
6 min 50 sec ago
14 min 58 sec ago
16 min 25 sec ago
19 min 26 sec ago
20 min 43 sec ago
23 min 51 sec ago
28 min 28 sec ago
33 min 42 sec ago