History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes. Oddly, or not, I don’t see Pravda on the Potomac or Izvestia on the Hudson offering this perspective to their extremely serious readership. That’s why we like McClatchy. I missed this on July 3:
When President Lyndon Johnson signed the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, he said to an aide, “We just gave the South to the Republicans.”
Indeed, Democrats lost their hold on the old Confederacy over the next decade, turning it into a bastion of Republican strength, first in presidential elections and later in congressional elections.
Now, another Texas president might well ask whether his Republican Party just gave away another section of the country, the Southwest and Mountain West.
President Bush had a way with Hispanic voters, steadily increasing his party’s share of the once-solid Democratic bloc from a dismal 21 percent in 1996 to 35 percent in 2000, 37 percent in 2002 and 40 to 44 percent in 2004.
His comprehensive immigration proposal might have helped build on those gains, with its path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.
But his proposal outraged his party’s conservative base. That base opposed the proposal for the last two years — contributing to a drop-off in Hispanic support for Republican congressional candidates last year — and finally killed the plan in the Senate last week.
With it went Bush’s hopes of a growing Republican share of the nation’s fastest- growing demographic group.
Excellent. Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of mendacious, racist, mercenary, lizard back-brained teenie-weinied overcompensating autocoprophagic torture-loving page-molesting Pharisaical Fuck
s.
But on the other side of the balance sheet, watch for the Hispanic vote to return to its lopsided support of Democrats. And with continuing growth in the Hispanic vote, that’s the side that could dominate.
That could push Florida away from Republicans, and remember how important it was to the party in 2000. That’s partly why Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, pushed for the Bush immigration plan in the Senate.
More importantly, it also could push away the Southwest — and help Democrats build a new base in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico, where a jump in Hispanic population is turning the region into the fastest growing in the country. The region has 29 Electoral College votes for president — sure to grow again after the 2010 census — and dozens of seats in the Senate and House of Representatives.
In Arizona, Republicans still hold both Senate seats, but Democrats gained two House seats there in 2006 and popular Democrat Janet Napolitano holds the governor’s office.
In Colorado, Democrat Ken Salazar won one of the two Senate seats in 2004, and Democrats took the governor’s office and a U.S. House seat last year.
In New Mexico, Democrat Bill Richardson was just re-elected governor, and the party holds one of two Senate seats. Republican Sen. Pete Domenici is up for re-election next year.
Say, I wonder if that’s why Domenici just came out with his highly principled stand on the Iraq Clusterfuck
?
In Nevada, home to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrats gave the state a coveted spot on the presidential nominating calendar — second, after Iowa — to allow the state’s Hispanic voters a bigger say in the nomination.
Democrats have been predicting a takeover of the Southwest for a decade. And they’ve made some gains. Now, with the Republican-led defeat of the comprehensive immigration plan, they might get what they’ve long wanted.
Bringing us round to Harry Reid. Obviously, I wish Reid hadn’t capitulated on the war.
But there’s no denying that he deked the Republicans but good on the immigration bill. Let’s not forget we’ve got a playbook too. Remember the Clinton impeachment? Somebody—I’m thinking Gephardt, but could have been Barney Frank—said the Dems were going to win by losing, because the Republicans couldn’t help being themselves. And indeed, they totally overreached.
Same deal here. Reid gave them the chance for an “up or down” vote, and the Republicans couldn’t help themselves. They just had to return to their conservative, nativist, racist roots. And they did so gleefully, and with full command of the airwaves, made sure everybody knew what they were about.
So, as a result of Republicans being themselves, they lose the Southwest. Excellent.
Back to Harry for a moment: I think if he were a pitcher, he’d be a crafty old junkballer. Kinda like Luis Tiant, anyone remember his windup? The one where he’s looking all the way back over the center field fence? Before windmilling round and tossing an 80-m.p.h. “fastball” that’s got so much sheer oddness on it that the humped-up, steroidal megalithic batter nearly corkscrews himself into homeplate even trying to see the thing…
That’s Harry Reid, and if the immigration bill fundamentally changed the electoral architecture in our favor for the next generation or so, good for him.
Loo-ie! Loo-ie! Loo-ie!
NOTE Did Kennedy know that was the plan, if it was the plan? I’m thinking no. He would be more effective as a true believer.
UPDATE I wrote “a nicer bunch of racist, Pharisaical, rich fucks”, but what I meant to write was “a nicer bunch of mendacious, racist, mercenary, lizard back-brained teenie-weinied overcompensating autocoprophagic torture-loving page-molesting Pharisaical Fucks.” Sorry if I inadvertently offended anyone by any lack of precision in my langauge.










Front page
Justice-Obstructing
You left out justice-obstructing, otherwise I do believe you’ve got the adjective list pretty much complete.
Props to you for recognizing Reed’s efforts, he’s goofy as hell but a really decent guy, straight up and honest and smart and actually believes the things he says. Don’t agree with him on everything, but I like him. The war appropriation was a great disappointment, but I do believe that if he had the votes he would have pushed ahead.
Things keep going this way and one day soon we’ll be reading lambert singing the praises of Nancy Pelosi, and won’t that be fine? :-)