Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 06/07/2013 - 6:03pm
The short version: May is usually a strong month for job creation. So while seasonally adjusted job creation is reported at 175,000, it actually increased by 885,000. This puts the January-June job creation period in line with and slightly better than the last 3 years. The problem is that this is still a very slow growth rate insufficient to deal with the enormous ongoing shortfall in jobs. And the quality of jobs being created remains crap. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 10:06pm
I had really meant to steer clear of Obama's May 23 counterterrorism speech, but I heard such different accounts of it, that it both ended and expanded the war on terror, I thought I should take a look.
Here is the speech: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-...
The accompanying fact sheet: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-preside...
And the guidance for counterterrorism operations outside the US: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/2013.05.23_fact_sh...
As always, it is a question of definitions. What Obama meant by an end to the global war on terror was that there would be no more Afghanistans, no more 100,000 soldier armies invading foreign countries.
"Beyond Afghanistan, we must define our effort not as a boundless “global war on terror,” but rather as a series of persistent, targeted efforts to dismantle specific networks of violent extremists that threaten America. In many cases, this will involve partnerships with other countries."
Minus Afghanistans (and Iraqs), it will still be global, a war, and against "the terrorists". This view is re-inforced in his discussion of the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) which has served as the "legal" basis for the current war on terror: Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 05/03/2013 - 5:15pm
Short Form: In seasonally adjusted terms, 165,000 jobs and unemployment dropping to 7.5% are OK, but not great results. At that job creation rate and taking population growth into account, it would take about 2 years to reduce by one million those currently unemployed. The BLS estimates current unemployment at 11.815 million. I calculate it at 20.542 million. So perhaps I should not say OK but rather next to nothing is being done to address the jobs situation. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Sat, 04/20/2013 - 4:32am
Carmen Ortiz, the US Attorney for Massachusetts, announced in a news conference following the capture of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that he would not be mirandized under the public safety exception. Ortiz you will remember is the ambitious political climber whose prosecutorial abuse drove public access advocate and internet activist Aaron Swartz to suicide. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 04/05/2013 - 3:42pm
Short Form: In March, in the Household survey, the BLS undercount of those unemployed grew, and the labor force became smaller. It will take 6-12 months to know whether the declines we are seeing in the size of the labor force are cyclical or secular. The adjusted and unadjusted numbers for the labor force showed different pictures. Adjusted (trend line), the labor force fell with employment and unemployment also falling. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 03/08/2013 - 2:21pm
In brief: Trendline, 236,000 jobs were added in February and the official unemployment rate fell to 7.7%. Actual jobs increased 959,000 but this followed a loss of 2.840 million last month. Similarly, employment rose 614,000 this month against a 1.446 million loss last month. However, notably the size of the labor force did not increase. The current rebuild and expansion of jobs should continue for the next two to three months. If this growth is choked off by the sequester or austerity, the consequences will extend through the rest of the year. My recalculated rate of unemployment remains high and declined only slightly to 12.5%. Hours increased this month which is good but wage gains taking inflation into account remain largely flat. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 12:44pm
Forget the names. It's all about the definitions. Here are some of them from the most recent CPI report covering January 2013:
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of the average change in prices over time of goods and services purchased by households. The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes CPIs for two population groups:
(1) the CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which covers households of wage earners and clerical workers that comprise approximately 29 percent of the total population
Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 03/01/2013 - 11:34am
Some noteworthy Supreme Court decisions fly under the radar. One such is Gabelli v. SEC. Roberts delivered the decision in which the whole Court concurred on February 27, 2013. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 02/01/2013 - 4:59pm
The short form: Yearly revisions increased the number of jobs created in 2012 by 647,000. These revisions make some comparisons difficult between December 2012 and January 2013 and obscure that January is an absolutely dreadful month for jobs and employment in real terms. After Christmas, the economy sheds large numbers of jobs that are not picked back up until later in the spring. The result is that while the adjusted numbers show gains, these numbers mark a trend basically bridging a chasm. The bottom of that chasm is where the economy now is. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Tue, 01/08/2013 - 3:22pm
In 1966, the budget for the federal government was 134.5 billion dollars ($656.1 billion in chained 2005 dollars). In 2011 (the most recent year where annual information is available), the federal budget was $3.603 trillion ($3.1786 in chained in 2005 dollars) or 4.8 times what it was in 1966 in real terms.
Similarly, GDP in 1966 was $787.1 billion ($3.8421 trillion in chained 2005 dollars) and $15.0757 trillion in 2011 ($13.2991 trillion in chained 2005 dollars) or some 3.5 times the 1966 GDP in real terms. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 01/04/2013 - 6:15pm
The current BLS jobs report covering December 2012 states, without qualification, that the official or U-3 unemployment rate remained unchanged at 7.8%. It is only on page 5 of the pdf in a table that you find that the November rate was originally reported (a few days before the election) as a more favorable 7.7% down from 7.9%. This revision is part of the BLS' yearly revision of its numbers in the Household (people) survey. This complicates matters because revisions to the Establishment (jobs) survey will not happen until next month. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Tue, 12/18/2012 - 1:43am
It is interesting that so many are so passionate about the 2nd amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Fri, 12/07/2012 - 4:19pm
[Please support lambert's fund drive. How many progressive sites do you know that have taken on the anti-progressivism of the modern Democratic party and had the integrity to move beyond it? Very few, and none with the panache that lambert brings to the effort] Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Wed, 11/07/2012 - 3:45pm
I decided to break a rule. The BLS says that it is inappropriate to calculate seasonally adjusted wages in constant dollars. But I did so anyway. Real wages in constant dollars allow us to compare wages over time.

Average real wages (blue line) were calculated by dividing nominal weekly wages seasonally adjusted for production and nonsupervisory employees (blue collar workers) by the CPI-U All Items index and multiplying the result by 100. This index is expressed in 1982-1984 dollars and is why the blue line intercepts the nominal wage line in 1984. Read below the fold...
Submitted by Hugh on Wed, 11/07/2012 - 2:20pm
Election night of which, thankfully, I watched very little was the culmination of a long, shabby, corrupt process ending in a celebration of a world that does not exist: participatory democracy. Americans were allowed to choose their destroyer. Would it be the guy who made his millions trashing companies, workers' jobs, and their pension plans and promised to bring these same skills to government or would it be the bland incumbent whose record in office could have been beaten by a cheap ham sandwich. Read below the fold...
Pages