Aztec economics
Primary tabs
Submitted by DCblogger on Tue, 08/09/2011 - 9:40pm
Thread:
Tags:

Don't call them austerians. That implies some sort of virtuous discipline. We are talking about a corrupt elite that wants 16 trillion for banksters and cuts in services for the peasants. They are ok with indiscriminate surveillance at $400 per month per line, they are ok with freedom bombs for Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and whoever. They only want cuts for WIC, Social Security, and Medicaid.
They want to sacrifice ordinary people for the further enrichment of the uber rich. This has nothing to do with austerity and everything to do with Aztec economics.
Words matter. Ideas matter. Every time someone uses the word austerian, we need to put Aztec economics in the comments.

- DCblogger's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Hi DCB
where's this indispensable grahic?
I'm not deedy enough
to put it up, maybe lambert could do so for me. Also, Aztec economics needs to be added to the glossary.
Absolutely!
n/t
Just technically...
... the key point to get across is "human sacrifice." I don't think just "Aztec" communicates that directly enough. But there is something here that needs a name, and Austerians is too small, because that's a faction of economist, and we're taking aim at official Washington, where all believe this stuff.
Actually, this is closer than I thought. Quoting Wikipedia:
Human sacrifice
is graphic and accurate. The "Pain caucus" is snappier and has been in use for a while.
I seriously think a poster of this (like Shepard Fairey's
iconic marketing of "The One") would be dynamite. Entitle it "Human Sacrifice", put a short piece of info at the bottom (eg, the share of US wealth held by whatever top percent, or the percentage the US pays greater than the rest of the world for health"care", or the amount we spend on our military vs the next ten largest countries combined, etc) But always at the top "HUMAN SACRIFICE".
Wow..the feedback already on faceborg is phenomenal
we need to propagate this bad boy! I can see a t-shirt (oh vaaast!) that will rival che's!
Julia, can you friend me on faceborg...
... so I can see this?
I'm "Lambert Strether."
Close to the bone
Just want to add my own metaphor for truth, which keeps hitting me these days. They don't care if we die: in fact, it's an added benefit. Why are we not all in the streets?
I don't blame folks: they have been bombarded with well-crafted messages that convince them that their interest is not their interest. I just keep trying to find a way to counter all that. BECAUSE IT IS A MATTER OF LIFE OR DEATH.
it's an added benefit
That's the chilling thought. Because if they are capable of seeing our deaths as a benefit. Then they are capable of engineering situations that make that outcome more likely. What's the purpose of "austerity" anyway? To make the lives of those who have the least even harder. It certainly won't make a dent in the deficit. It's a pretext for a malicious and immoral policy. Sacrifice to appease the god of greed. So far, Aztec economics is the best metaphor I've heard.
key point is "human sacrifice." = Mel Gibson's Apocalypto
Shared sacrifice
Obama putting Medicare on the table
Yes We Can!
"Apocalypto Economics"
Is the movie popular enough for that to click?
I presume that movie is bad!
It was actually pretty good
Mel Gibson is a gifted director, and he's also crazy. Mix them together.. and you get this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_LIzqF0J2M
As Steve Sailer noted...
Since no Hollywood studio would work with Gibson on The Passion, he pocketed the huge profits, allowing him to make Apocalypto, with an all-Amerindian cast speaking Mayan. It wasn’t the huge hit The Passion was, but it made over $50 million at the U.S. box office. That was rather good for (allow me to say it again) a mainstream movie with an all-Amerindian cast speaking Mayan.
Read more: http://takimag.com/article/hollywood_chi...
I agree.
I'm deeply skeptical of anything made by Gibson, but Apocalypto is worth seeing. For a story with little dialog, I was surprised that it held my attention for the entire 139 minutes.
I concur
Very good movie. You should see it.
Agree
Mel is a racist sexist slob, but he is is also a tremendously gifted actor and director. It causes me no end of cognitive dissonanace