If you have "no place to go," come here!

APRIL 24, 2010-NYC SINGLE PAYER SUMMIT-Thoughtful, Committed Citizens Changing the World ... In Spite of the (Friggin') World

Margaret Mead once said:

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

On Saturday, April 24th, I attended a Single Payer Teach-in at St. Luke’s Hospital on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. It was a thrill for me to get to hang for a day with some of the universal health care champions whose articles and/or civil disobedient adventures I have been following on the PNHP (Physicians for a National Health Program) website over the past year. Leaders such as Dr. Andy Coates, Dr. Margaret Flowers, Katie Robbins.

Had I been a more deeply involved and a longer term single payer activist, I could do justice to many of the other hero-activists that were also there in the huge hospital conference-auditorium. I felt humbled and a bit guilty rubbing elbows with these members of Mead's "small group", the serious walkers of the walk. The marathoners of universal health care. Ready for the next round. At one point someone declared he had been battling "35 years of Reaganomics."

The unofficial theme of the event was labeled by one speaker: "How to keep the energy going." There was to be morale building and strategic planning for the next wave of activism. There was also to be a deserved degree of collective mourning and expression of anger and frustration for the passage of the dysfunctional new health insurance bill.

I went there to learn, as well as give these activists my support. I went -- selfishly -- to use them for my own morale re-building. I also went because lambert had posted the event on correntewire and madamab recommended I go since she couldn't. Sometimes that extra networking is a real kick in the ass -- to get one from the point of "hmmm .... maybe I SHOULD go," and then forgetting all about it, to taking it very seriously because other people are.

Handwritten jottings from this event have been sitting in a small blue spiral notebook at the bottom of my backpack for several weeks. Since I'd turned my work schedule at the last minute upside down to attend, I had gone on very little sleep. I was easily reminded of this from the sloppy and cryptic note-taking. A bit of googling and emotional memory are helping me fill in the blanks to offer a belated and limited summary on the NYC summit of this vital social movement.

I noticed on the back cover of my notebook that I had jotted down during the course of the day catchy, often acerbic references to our health care system I had heard. Let me spill an eclectic few. (Sorry they are out of context.)

Medical apartheid
Cruel health care incrementalism of Obama
Grand experiment of neo-liberalism (from Andy Coates)
DEFORM not Reform
Corporatism is a polite word for fascism (I heard this one a few times)
Public option, wholesale embrace of privatization
Democracy is not a Spectator Sport (on T-shirt)
It's not that we are now against the Dem party, WE ARE ANTI-RULING CLASS
SPINO (single payer in name only)
Obamacare is a Band-Aid
No Long Term Care = Enforced Poverty

There were compelling analyses from so many articulate and passionate spokespeople, but I think by focusing primarily on the early, keynote address of Dr. Margaret Flowers I can convey at least some of the essence and intention of the single payer movement at this point in time. Dr. Flowers is a determined champion of health care reform and a captivating speaker. And, God bless her, she provided a tight outline of straightforward talking points my sleep-deprived mind could wrap around.

She began her talk with the 3 goals of the Single Payer movement (what Single Payer advocates are still VERY determined to achieve), then turned to the 3 main things Single Payer Advocates learned during this most recent health care reform battle. (Dr. Flowers has also written an article entitled: After the Reform: Aiming High for Health Justice for Tikkun Magazine which I will refer to also.)


Dr. Flowers asserted that of the 3 major goals of the Single Payer movement:


... NOT ONE was achieved within the new Congressional reform. (As the auditorium audience collectively released a mournful sigh. Three for zip? Zip for three? How do you say it? (Actually, I say it, "Aggggghhhhhhh!!!!"))

Dr. Flowers acknowledged some of the positives of the new Obamacare legislation:

The inclusion of children up until the age of 26 in their parents' insurance plans.

The gradual closing of the infamous "donut hole".

An emphasis on prevention and public health.

Increased funding for community health centers.

Some incentives for primary care providers.

Okay, deep breath. Here are just some of the serious issues (relating to the lack of universality, equity and accountability) with Obamacare that were discussed by Dr. Flowers (with some expansion from her own article, Dr. Andy Coates' and others' later talks and also an article by Drs. Woolhandler and Himmelstein).

1) The bill will omit at least 23 million Americans from any coverage.

2) The individual mandate (to purchase private insurance with penalties for noncompliance) will force people who can't afford health care to pay a fine for not affording health care as well as having to go without it. At the same time, the mandates guarantee the private insurance companies millions of new customers.

3) The requirement to accept people with pre-existing conditions will increase premiums to unaffordable levels. People will be forced to purchase policies with "skimpier" coverage or do without. This will increase the numbers of under- and uninsured Americans. This will also drive even more Americans into bankruptcy from medical debt.

4) There will be no government cost-saving negotiations for drug purchasing. Drug firms will be paid full price for their products.

5) Employers are still in control of insurance plans for their employees. Many will undoubtedly drop employees from their insurance plans because of costs. It will be cheaper for them to pay the fines for doing so.

6) There will not be enough primary care physicians in place to equitably cover even the insured population.

7) The bill is unfair to women. It offers no subsidies for abortions, setting up an unjust double standard -- accessibility of abortions for wealthier women but not poorer ones.

8) The bill is unfair to immigrants. The law excludes undocumented immigrants from buying insurance in the new exchanges, even if they can pay full price. The bill bars legal immigrants (green-card holders) from receiving publicly subsidized insurance for five years.

9) There is no serious cost oversight. Some providers may charge, say, tobacco-using patients up to 50% more than non-tobacco users for coverage.

10) Co-pays will grow ever larger.

11) In 2018 the taxation on so-called "Cadillac plans" will kick in and will hit millions of working families.

12) Health care plans will become "skimpier" across the board and there will be huge out-of-pocket expenses.

13) There will still be a serious number of HMOs delivering inferior care at inflated prices and overcharging Medicare.

14) The law reduces federal subsidies to public and other "safety-net hospitals." There will be fewer such hospitals and they will be overwhelmed. Since 23 million Americans will remain uninsured, millions will desperately need safety net hospitals since many hospitals reject patients with costly illnesses.

15) The bureaucracy will take on nightmarishly complicated and costly proportions, especially the initial defining of eligibility among the citizenry. One of the advantages of expanding Medicare for All was to save on the bureaucratic and executive pay costs of about 30 cents on the dollar. These already high costs are bound to spike upwards.

Flowers finally stressed that the Obamacare legislation is full of loopholes that will allow private insurers to handily avoid serious regulation.

Before I go on with Dr. Flowers analysis of lessons learned, I would like to acknowledge yet one more very serious often ignored problem not remedied in Obamacare. Long term health care. Pearl Corn blogging on Huffington Post eloquently captured the intense degree of consciousness raising we were all privileged to experience and witness at the Saturday summit from some protesting attendees:

The most compelling and heart-wrenching part of the event was the appearance of six severely disabled men and women in wheelchairs. ... Long-term care only exists with Medicaid, meaning you must prove poverty and have no assets to qualify. These folks have been marginalized and left to a life of poverty.

One man, disabled rights activist Danny Robert [who had once had a successful career in the motion picture industry], is afflicted with MS and spoke from his wheelchair, breathing from an oxygen tank with his companion and fellow activist Nadina LaSpina by his side in her own wheelchair holding his speech for him. He described the challenges this community lives with every day, and she noted that if they had married, he would have been taken off of Medicaid because she had taught at the New School and other universities and had income, so he would no longer qualify for Medicaid. She has polio and in time will go on Medicaid as well. Then they will be able to marry, impoverished but together. This group of activists fight daily to live independent lives in their own apartments with aides they train to fill their needs. No institutional existence for them, a core issue for these feisty activists. They are inspirational.

In her article Ms. Corn asks, "What kind of an America have we become when our laws prevent marriage in order to qualify for a class-defined healthcare program that is Medicaid?" She points out that the Obama health plan has no provision for long-term care. This is a major issue most Americans don't want to address and yet may be forced to one day. Only in the Single Payer Conyers bill H.R. 676 is long term care included, for rich and poor, without the declared poverty stigma and restrictions of Medicaid.


Okay. That was a lot to take in. But allow yourself another deep breath, square your shoulders and let's move on to Dr. Flowers' 3 Lessons Learned from this most recent health care reform fight (with, again, some additional commentary from other speakers and relevant blogs).



Under her first category, "Not To Compromise", I had scribbled down in all caps Dr. Flowers' declaration, “ANYTHING LESS THAN FULL UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IS A DISASTER!” Flowers also made use of a quote from Gandhi:

All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it is all give and no take.

In her article she applied this quote as a wise argument with which to refute the White House's and Congress' insistence that compromise must happen within the private insurance model framework. According to Flowers and the Single Payer activists, Obamacare abandons the "fundamentals." Denies all citizens a basic human right to health security. Refuses to establish the fundamentals of "universality, equity and accountability." It allows preventable deaths, continued suffering from under- or non-insurance, debilitating bankruptcies from medical debt.

Flowers pointed out that all other industrialized nations have health systems based on the principles of health care as a human right. Our health care system, so inequitable and ranked a lowly 37th by the World Health Organization, is ironically also the costliest among industrial nations.

Dr. Flowers spoke of the incredible pressure to pass ANYTHING within the White House and the Democrats of Congress. To have this "anything" heralded an accomplishment since our Dem president had made health care his "signature issue." She pointed out that Obama surrounded himself with many who had fought for health care reform during Clinton's reign and were undoubtedly "traumatized". "They had an escalated fear of the corporate opposition and squandered an honest national debate on back room deals." (ugh) Not so surprising the many perks extended to industry not citizenry in Obamacare.

As for the public option, a particular sore spot for us single payer advocates, Flowers pointed out it was a useful (though ever nebulous) entity in "splitting the single payer movement and confusing and distracting it with endless discussion about what type of public option would be effective. "

Despite all the brouhaha about the public option and its acknowledgment in the media echo chamber, Flowers declared there was never any chance it would be included in the regulation. She wrote in her article that in March 2009 Baucus admitted it existed as a "bargaining chip only" and that Glenn Greenwald a year later confirmed it had been privately negotiated away, long before Congress ended what Flower labeled its "charade" fight for it.

Most confounding was how pro-corporate the President and Congress were in refusing to acknowledge abundant data that a market driven health care system was unsustainable. This unsustainability is clearly evidenced by the cost-challenged "reform" health care state program of Massachusetts.


According to Dr. Flowers the most frustrating attack on clarity (beside the insane hysteria of "socialism") was the confusion of single payer with the public option. That was both due to diabolical deliberation and obtuseness on the part of the corporate-owned media. It lumped all objectors to Obamacare as "pro-public option." In reality there was a serious moral and philosophical divide between the two groups of advocates.

Dr. Flowers acknowledged there was a certain naivete among us Single Payer advocates that common sense would simply prevail. Access and affordability one would think would be compelling arguments. She claimed that legislators and pro-reform groups liked to speak about principles but were not challenged enough on the commitment for implementation of these principles. She believes the Single Payer advocates were too tentative in what they were asking for.

Indulge me an interruptive rant here. I, too, had assumed long ago that common sense would prevail. Single payer health care. Sane, simple and clear. Humanitarian and fiscally renewing. It would generate between $350 and $400 billion a year to cover all of us. The gouging insurance providers would be out of the equation. What more could we want, America? A cake walk to legislative victory I naively assumed. Logic and EMPATHY (oh dear!!!) would be applied to our national situation. What was I thinking? Where have I been?

This is bizarro-world. Ethical freakshow America. The era of craven and/or obtuse media disinformation and/or total black-outs of all that is wholesomely relevant. Hysterical crazymaking protesters commandeering the airwaves. Matt Taibbi drolly quotes the type: “Keep the Guv’mint off my Medicare.” Tea Party faux-populism, significantly and covertly sponsored by the likes of Dick Armery of FreedomWorks and other right wing/corporate entities. The ferocious and amoral corporate cronyism that flourished under Bush and the fresher hells of cronyism now with Obama.

I, too, waited for Single Payer Expanded Medicare For All to be embraced and celebrated as America's solution to its health care crisis. It was ignored. It was never allowed on that damn "table." I wrote a blog after a frustrating while entitled "Single Payer – Code Name 'Rumpelstiltskin'”. For so long I had been chewing on my fist in exasperation. How could I be watching the media, President and members of Congress totally IGNORE what was clearly best for the country? Even Frontline ... FRONTLINE!!! ... conflated public option with single payer -- adding profound insult to profound national injury by omitting the words and total concept of "single payer."

The ferocity of the disinformation, disenfranchisement campaign of the single payer enemies from both parties, of the corporations, of the media -- that campaign's ultimate effectiveness -- was a very bitter pill for us single payer advocates to swallow.

Dr. Flowers said firmly, clearly and reassuringly that now that the "clamor" of the health care bill has died down, it is time for this country to have a “civilized” discussion. She also pointed out that we obviously cannot count on corporate-driven mainstream media to foster such a discussion. It will have to be a on a more personal, grass roots level and through “independent sources of media.”

In her article she eloquently cited the humane as well as achievable goals of Physicians for a National Health Program, founded in 1987:

We envision a lifelong universal health system-much like traditional Medicare-that is nationwide. We envision a system that allows patients to choose where they receive their care, permits caregivers and patients to determine the best course of treatment with assistance from evidence-based data, controls costs in a rational way through simplified administration and negotiation of fair prices, and is progressively financed. Its publicly funded nature would make it transparent and accountable. Because it would be privately delivered, it would allow caregivers to compete based on quality of care provided. Private health insurers would be relegated to a position of offering supplemental plans and possibly providing administrative support.

Dr. Coates made a most insightful comment at one point as to why clarity was NOT allowed to prevail by desperate right wing conservatives and corporatists. "If single payer had been embraced it would have exploded the Reagan myth that government is evil and incompetent!"


Another all caps quote from Dr. Flowers in my notebook:


Dr. Flowers continued that even by the supposed allies of Single Payer we were sold out: Kucinich, Conyers, Sanders, Wiener. They succumbed to party pressure and group think. The "hold your nose and vote for the lesser of evils" decision-making prevailed.

Dr. Flowers contended that the final mistake was allowing the upcoming elections to impact the context of passing reform. Also for allowing the mainstream media to ignore or dismiss the Single Payer movement as a super-left, super-fringe group when it was acknowledged at all. The Single Payer movement should have remained and insisted on being identified as non-partisan. It should not have relied so much on the support of the Democratic party. Not only were Democrats in our government beholding financially to corporate donors, but also driven by that need to pass ANYTHING and declare it successful so as to ensure success in upcoming elections. They were pressured to support the compromising backroom deal-making of their President.

What easily prevailed was the gamesmanship to settle for the "appearance of historic reform" rather than the statesmanship of fighting honorably for its actuality.

I seem to be turning in my blogs these days to Dr. Martin Luther King as a forever spiritual messenger for the healing of America. In the context of this blog, it is Dr. Flowers who cited him within her own very inspiring declaration:

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. taught us that to witness an injustice and not work to correct it is in itself an act of violence. As a physician and an advocate for nonviolence, I cannot ignore the injustice of the great health inequality that exists in our nation or ignore those in need who cannot afford medical treatment. We have delayed this struggle for too long. Alice Walker said, "We are the ones we have been waiting for." So, let's do it. We have the resources. Now we must create the political will. Together, we can create a health justice movement, educate ourselves, speak with clarity, and organize independently of any political party.

A health justice movement. Count me in, Dr. Flowers!

No votes yet


Submitted by hipparchia on

thank you for this. i'm going to have to come back later to read and digest all of it, but just skimming, i'm glad to see that some of the lessons learned are


because i've felt all along that these were very important.

DCblogger's picture
Submitted by DCblogger on

it is really great to see members of this blog particlpate in the things we post about.

3) The requirement to accept people with pre-existing conditions will increase premiums to unaffordable levels. People will be forced to purchase policies with "skimpier" coverage or do without. This will increase the numbers of under- and uninsured Americans. This will also drive even more Americans into bankruptcy from medical debt.

this is a poorly understood aspect part of health whatever reform and one we will need to publicize.

Submitted by libbyliberal on

I feel like the teacher on the Peanuts cartoons when I try to talk to the non-choir about single payer. "wockwockwockwockwock" .... When I first started getting emails about how great single payer would be I sent them off excitedly. It seemed so clear and straightforward and THE ANSWER. Why couldn't people wrap their minds around it? I have math and and money and insurance and all sorts of economic stuff anxiety when it comes to processing stuff ... but this HR676 and SP expanded medicare seemed clear and straightforward. If I could get it... why not so many others????

Neo-liberalism ... selling out to corporatism anti-liberalism. So it seems.

madamab's picture
Submitted by madamab on

I so wish I had not been working that day. I would have been there with you!

This paragraph is really the key for me:

Dr. Flowers contended that the final mistake was allowing the upcoming elections to impact the context of passing reform. Also for allowing the mainstream media to ignore or dismiss the Single Payer movement as a super-left, super-fringe group when it was acknowledged at all. The Single Payer movement should have remained and insisted on being identified as non-partisan. It should not have relied so much on the support of the Democratic party. Not only were Democrats in our government beholding financially to corporate donors, but also driven by that need to pass ANYTHING and declare it successful so as to ensure success in upcoming elections. They were pressured to support the compromising backroom deal-making of their President.

Amen, Dr. Flowers! Let us hope that single-payer advocacy groups do not make that mistake again. We've seen where it leads with every issue we care about.

Submitted by libbyliberal on

I would so love to have shared it with you and gotten your take on things, too. It would have been fun.

You've gotten me out into the proverbial "field" three times, madamab! Activism is contagious. I thank you.

I learned some enlightening stuff. Some of the stuff I didn't realize was so enlightening until I started wrestling with my notes just the past couple days.

I think Flowers' outline showed SUPER-CLARITY. I liked what Andy Coates said about how single payer would have exploded the myth of Reaganism and the government being evil.

The rat bastards were so formidable against SP. And the avalanches of money to block America from taking the most renewing and best course. It is so heart confounding. Amazing how SP was banished from public consciousness by media et al. Public option people were the hardest for me to fathom, why they saw SP as enemy and not on the same side for eventual universal health care. And were so "pragmatically" willing to postpone universal health care for future generations instead of embracing it now. What was that about? Obama incrementalism kool aid?!

Remember Robert Kennedy saying that line about how some people see things as they are and ask "why?" and he saw things as they might be and asked "why not?"

I think of Single Payer people as the subject in the "If" poem, if you can keep your head when all about you, are losing theirs and blaming it on you. The book people in Bradbury's orginal Fahrenheit 451.

Ralph Keyes said, "We live in post-rational America." Add to that post-feeling.

Thanks for responding. :)

Submitted by lambert on

Modulo some of the wording, since it seems quite clear to me that both (some) men and (some) women (often) suffer and endure as described in the poem:

If you can keep your head when all about you

Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,

If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,

But make allowance for their doubting too;

If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,

Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,

Or being hated, don't give way to hating,

And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;

If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;

If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster

And treat those two impostors just the same;

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken

Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

Or watch the things you gave your life to broken,

And stoop and build 'em up with wornout tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings

And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,

And lose, and start again at your beginnings

And never breathe a word about your loss;

If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew

To serve your turn long after they are gone,

And so hold on when there is nothing in you

Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,

Or walk with kings - nor lose the common touch,

If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,

If all men count with you, but none too much;

If you can fill the unforgiving minute

With sixty seconds' worth of distance run -

Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,

And - which is more - you'll be a Man my son!

Submitted by libbyliberal on

I only remembered the first few lines, but reading more deeply into this poem, I feel and appreciate the catharsis ... its comfort and sanity in insane times .... helps me process even more the slings and arrows of what we single payers just went through and what the conference helped me with. Thanks again for letting me know about it, btw!

I really got chills. My fave lines today:

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

And of course, the bit about the will that says "Hold on!" so moves!

I forgot the "unforgiving minute" line was in this poem, too. Re activism, I need to fill that minute with a lot more activism seconds.

Appreciate. :)

Submitted by libbyliberal on

... we are contributing to the dead weight of the problem. I get lost in awe at the insaniacs, but then that paralysis is not helping anyone either. another old adage, the "good Germans" ....

Good and sobering writing c/o Ian. thanks:

Sometimes our role in life isn’t even “to hold the line” it’s to engage in a fighting retreat, to buy time for others. For most of us alive today, that may be our job. It’s not glorious, it’s not fun, but it is necessary.

votermom's picture
Submitted by votermom on

In church on Sunday they were selling raffle tickets to help a kid pay for experimental surgery (paralyzed arm). A week before on livejournal a fan group was holding an online auction to help someone pay for a liver transplant. It seems like there are more tiny fund-raising events cropping up for healthcare cases all the time.

Here's my question -- is there a website/page/blog anywhere that could keep track of fund-raising like this? It seems like it would be a good thing on several levels to have a pro-single-payer website that lists fund-raising efforts for people who need healthcare.

If there isn't one, is this something corrente could do? Like a weekly report or something that if you hear of one you submit it? It would help generate publicity, plus it sort of bears witness to the glaring need.

(Not being part of a fund-raising itself, since that is tricky since you might get scammers, but just reporting on such & such effort in a neighborhood)

Submitted by libbyliberal on

Somewhere in my notes or research there was advice given, I think, on posting to a blog, maybe with California Nurses Association... let me dig back and get back to you... to post one's IRL situations and ways to cope. Darn, I wish I had been savvy enough to include that but great you are bringing it up now. We can also email pnhp and california nurses and inquire there. Healthcare now. I know NY state single payer is really strong but I am not yet hooked up with them except for meeting some at conference. Maybe someone else reading this can help, too. Sisterk? Hipparchia?

I don't know if that would fulfill the need you are talking about. A greater need it sounds like for something more exclusively for alternative charitable publicity-seeking help and support and just plain comfort, etc., and continued consciousness raising for sanity and empathy. Maybe we at Corrente can brainstorm, too. I spent a lot of time visiting the articles site at pnhp, not so much the interactive blogs. Also, single payer action articles. But if there could be a connector location for people, or a referral umbrella site, clearing house site or something that other sites could mutually direct others to.

Again, maybe we both and anyone else could chase this idea down a bit more? Lambert? Madamab? Any ideas or contacts?

You know, that teach-in was great and hearing the theories and the concepts but when the wheel-chair bound long-term care activists spoke, it really made what this whole movement is about R-E-A-L. It made us all FEEL it, not just think it. And I met people that Saturday who have joined single payer AFTER facing down a dysfunctional health care system that whammied their lives. One old friend I met there and need to get back in touch with had been wrestling with Lyme disease.

The people soldiering through the crises now, they have the courage and need the support, and their spirit will sustain our will showing us the reality of just how crazymaking and formidable and unjust the friggin' system is and how resourceful and courageous the human spirit can be.

sisterkenney's picture
Submitted by sisterkenney on

Just a drive-by post, running here, but ASFIK the NNU website (here: ), is probably more current, altho it does link to CNA, also, but the NNU is a national org. Also, just a thought, but Michael Moore might be a good source/aggregator, he got alot of letters during the Sicko campaign.

votermom's picture
Submitted by votermom on

I wonder if encouraging fund-raisers who don't have a webpage to submit there then linking to that weekly would work (still with the simple link aggregation idea).

On the zuska thread mentioned, someone was inspired to start a blog called (doesn't have any posts this year though)

Submitted by libbyliberal on

Can the people from the church you spoke of use that publish your story one? I hope so.

I wish there were a "vacuum" fund for bonus baby elite with the tiniest shreds of conscience left to give back some of that money trickling ever upward and to trickle it back in a sane way with some sane governance. But, what the hey, denial is pretty thorough right now it seems on paralyzing and blinding so many. Freezing consciences.

Submitted by lambert on
I just reread this post, and this jumped out at me:
The ferocity of the disinformation, disenfranchisement campaign of the single payer enemies from both parties, of the corporations, of the media -- that campaign's ultimate effectiveness -- was a very bitter pill for us single payer advocates to swallow.
It was. It was especially distressing to see what one had naively thought of as colleagues, or at least allies, participate in the ferocity. That's going to be a litmus test for a long, long time.

Submitted by libbyliberal on

... and yes, I so agree about that bitter betrayal and crazymaking from the PRAGMATIC (HAH!!!) right wing of our left wing if you know what I mean. Geeeez. The crazymaking of the Obama apologists. Giving him a cake walk (what the hell is that, anyway ... I find myself using it a lot, I get the essence) to continue on even more vigorously the dismantling work so savagely but more covertly -- incredibly -- done during Bushco, but now rolling unchallenged except from the disenfranchised and marginalized sane ones of us.

Tonight I went to another anti-war event (look what you and madamab have done to me, I am changing out of the screen side jammies and putting down the cheetos (wonder what electric orange junk food does to the body, especially the electric orange part of it ... all that dust) and getting out with the IRL foot soldiers a bit. Course, the cyber foot soldiers and officers are no slouches, either).

Anyway, the event was at this awesome bookstore on W. 46th St., Revolution Books (Connie there said maybe she could sell vastlast's t-shirts on consignment ... I must write him, his T is my uniform for protests and events now) and the people there tonight were so motivated and wise. Ray McGovern phoned in his part of the presentation. The World Can't Wait. Debra Sweet was there. They just published this amazing protest advertisement in NY Review of Books that nails Obama and his steroid executive powered militarism. I wonder if we can publish it here from their website or one of their emails. If I email you a pdf of it?

I am writing up a blog of what I witnessed tonight but not quite ready. They re-showed the wikileaks film of the slaughter of civilians from the helicopter. So very chilling. Carl Dix also spoke, he was a Viet Nam conscientious objector who had to serve time in Leavenworth cuz of that. VERY inspiring. He spoke about My Lai massacre.

Debra Sweet said that slowly Obama is losing some of his original high profile supporters. Cornel West and Bill Ayers, for example, signed off on the protest letter that is part of the ad. That gives me hope. The tipping point for some. But what more does he have to do to make people see how our constitution is being gutted further by him. Glenn Greenwald keeps calling him out on everything. Not so the big websites, mainstream media, the friggin Congress (friggin and rat bastards... they are now getting a lot of repetition by me I notice). As Flowers and Gandhi point out, you mustn't muck with the moral fundamentals. But Obama, front man for the corrupt system and its horrifying destructive status quo, smiles and does so. And so many nod and take another sip of koolaid. Aggggggghhhh. Morality is flicked away now as ideology!

BTW, I left a link on lex's blog about Beck . The link shows Lewis Black doing one of the funniest mockings I have ever seen. If you haven't seen it yet.