A blog (from "web blog") is a discussion or informational site consisting of discrete entries ("posts") typically displayed newest first. All Corrente posts are front-paged; there is no up-rate or down-rate process. Corrente posts are almost entirely community moderated. We encourage a clash of ideas, and do not encourage a clash of persons.
If you are the author of this post, see the Edit tab ad Help (and Advanced Help) for detailed documentation.
...not named Obama or Romney running for president? How can that be? I am constantly told that those two are the only choices. These third party candidates must be an illusion...
Upon reflection, I realize my previous post was not responsive to your question - sorry, i was responding with a plea for unity on the left, instead of answering your question ...
For my money, it makes sense to vote for the heaviest possible counterweight to the legacy parties, without worrying about purity at all (leaving aside any Handmaid's Tale parties on the right, which I'd never vote for).
Not to say that electoral politics works, or even that representative democracy works. Rather, a stronger third party might just prevent the two legacy parties from doing as much damage as they would otherwise do, especially in the lame duck session.
but they may be overplaying their differences. you can't expect everyone to be in 100% agreement. there has to be some compromise.
I think your point about the system "working" is a valid one. The party dynamic is ok for reformist policies, but terrible for instituting real change.
See France, for example. Granted, Hollande isn't far enough left for my sanctimonious purism, but he's a step in the left direction. And if it can happen there, why not here? At least we can make ourselves heard.
Wow, who knew that there were other candidates who consider themselves to be serious contenders for the presidency. Well, on second thought they must know that they aren't taken seriously.
Three more political parties in the United States are holding presidential debates according to these recent posts because they feel that they actually have a chance.
Comments
Wait! You mean there are other candidates...
...not named Obama or Romney running for president? How can that be? I am constantly told that those two are the only choices. These third party candidates must be an illusion...
No illusions here my friend...
It's also interesting that half of the candidates here are women.
That's got to be a record for presidential debate, or close to a record...
To these candidates add
Jerry White candidate for president, Socialist Equality Party here.
Sorry, jest
Upon reflection, I realize my previous post was not responsive to your question - sorry, i was responding with a plea for unity on the left, instead of answering your question ...
Perhaps they're not parties, but sects
For my money, it makes sense to vote for the heaviest possible counterweight to the legacy parties, without worrying about purity at all (leaving aside any Handmaid's Tale parties on the right, which I'd never vote for).
Not to say that electoral politics works, or even that representative democracy works. Rather, a stronger third party might just prevent the two legacy parties from doing as much damage as they would otherwise do, especially in the lame duck session.
sects are fine...
but they may be overplaying their differences. you can't expect everyone to be in 100% agreement. there has to be some compromise.
I think your point about the system "working" is a valid one. The party dynamic is ok for reformist policies, but terrible for instituting real change.
It just isn't designed to do what is necessary.
See France, for example.
See France, for example. Granted, Hollande isn't far enough left for my sanctimonious purism, but he's a step in the left direction. And if it can happen there, why not here? At least we can make ourselves heard.
Re: the lame duck session, and beyond:
Read this and weep.
one small beacon of hope
there are several mentions of single payer in the comments on that article.
no need to apologize...
your comment was still a valid point!
Wow, who knew that there were
Wow, who knew that there were other candidates who consider themselves to be serious contenders for the presidency. Well, on second thought they must know that they aren't taken seriously.
Three more political parties in the United States are holding presidential debates according to these recent posts because they feel that they actually have a chance.