About those Republicans in the cabinet: Two slots down, one to go
Primary tabs
Submitted by lambert on Wed, 12/17/2008 - 10:49am
Yesterday, there were three open slots, and the Republicans, naturally, wanted all three. Today, two of them went to Dems: Vilsack to Agriculture, Salazar to Interior. That leaves one:
CIA.
Is the tension building toward a massive Rivalgasm?

- lambert's blog

- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
there's 2 more, i think -- Transportation and DNI
isn't Director of National Intelligence Cabinet- level?
"the ethanol industry's requests for billions in federal aid"
Obama picks Tom Vilsack, former Iowa governor, as agriculture secretary
For a True Rivalgasm
Obama would select either Valerie Plame or Joe Wilson to head up the CIA. It would also bolster his anti-war cred since they told the truth about the sketchy intelligence used to lie the country into war. Hillary Clinton and those who supported her over Obama are his true rivals, and I'm not hearing about too many (any at all?) prominent Hillary supporters besides herself getting influential posts in the new administration. Valerie and Joe, though, are probably out of the running due to things like competence and good sense and well, this.
Also Labor
But I doubt that one will go to a Republican.
I've heard news people using Vilsack as another example of a 'rival'. I think that formulation has officially jumped the shark.
Ray LaHood for Transportation?
I've heard LaHood is the choice for Transportation. If true, I don't understand. LaHood is a Republican flunkie. He got the congressional seat for the IL-18 after his boss, Bob Michel, retired. Now he is retiring from Congress. He was a god-awful congressman. I grew up in the IL-18; my family is still there. They view Ray as somewhat less than useless as a Representative.
And isn't Obama supposed to be a big supporter of rail and mass transit? Why wouldn't he give this spot to someone with, you know, actual experience in transportation work? How about a strong policy advocate for expanding and improving public transit?
Lots of those infrastructure projects Obama talks about involve various aspects of our transportation network. Wouldn't this be a good time for a visionary at transportation to help structure those projects?
Also, as an aside, LaHood was handpicked by Newt to chair the impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton. He was and is a smarmy guy.
infrastructure is billions to private companies --
the GOP has more experience in that, so i guess Obama thought a Repub would be more efficient and "pragmatic" at it?
ugh.
Supertrain Inc., here we come! and all other highways, roads, bridges, ports, subways, canals, levees, ...
yup-- "bipartisan", "a pragmatist" and anti-union too --
LaHood Pick for Transportation Has Stakeholders Buzzing --
Suggests to me Obama doesn't think Transportation is important--
Also, BushBoy gave Transportation to Mineta, a retired Dem, so it's another page from the Rove playbook.
"The Permanent Government"
Craig Crawford --
Not quite a position in his cabinet
but certainly a strong statement.
Maybe Project Rescue will send an emissary to the inauguration, now that we're all friends.he's the new Billy Graham for sure now --
this will make it official.
appalling.
"actively promoted legalized discrimination"
Politico - -Gay activists furious with Obama
Warren?!
Talk about putting a coal in someone's Christmas stocking. Good Lord. There's no point in Obama saying homophobia is wrong when he still chooses to surround himself with homophobic bigots who exploit religion to push hate.
This reminds me of the Catholic Church claiming child rape was wrong back when the Boston scandals came out but then selected disgraced Cardinal Law to be prominently involved in the funeral of Pope John Paul II a few years later. Obviously, the message was not, "We think child rape is wrong and we take it seriously." The same here with Obama and homophobia.
Merry Christmas, all!!!!
& anti-choice too --
totally pro-life, as usual for them.
his "forum" was where Obama said women should consult their pastors before having abortions, and that when iife begins was "above his pay grade".
Rick Warren knows gay people!
Yet another iteration of the "some of my best friends" defense of bigotry. Seriously, this guy is the best Obama could do?
"if he'd really wanted to"
famous, political, controversial,
i'd have cheered if it had been jeremiah wright.
i'd have been even more cheered if he'd said there would be no invocation though.
Ben Smith also mentions
that Aravosis is none too pleased -- anyone care to venture over there? The last time I stopped by, the CDS was unbearable and I haven't been able to stomach going back. The fact that Aravosis didn't seem to understand that misogyny and homophobia are closely related made it even worse -- this development shouldn't be taking anyone by surprise -- well, anyone who wasn't willfully ignoring the clear examples of both during the campaign, that is.
Pam's good on it -- lots of links too --
Homobigot Rick Warren to deliver invocation at inauguration
i won't go back to Americablog -- he squandered all his cred with me a while ago.
Hillary Rosen is going off about Warren now on CNN --
but it's still only being presented as a "gays are angry" thing, and nothing about choice or torture or anything else.
she's absolutely furious. good!
meanwhile, CNN calls Warren "America's Pastor" and loves him -- gives him all the airtime he wants -- always.
Ray LaHood it is for Transporation
That was a huge disappointment considering my state is finally starting to get very serious about mass transit. To have a Republican (no matter how moderate her or she may be) overlooking transportation is not a good thing. It's going to be "public-private" all. of. the. damned. time. No, he really can't be serious about transit to not just choose a Republican, but some GOP lackey because he's known for "reaching across the aisle."