A note on impeachment kayfabe
I'm not good on the right wing fever swamp, so I'll just assume that if the wingers impeach Obama, it's going to be over a Chinese menu that includes Benghazi, ObamaCare, something to do with immigration, and maybe Bowe Bergdahl. Who knows? The key point is this:
The two "slam dunks" for impeaching Obama are (1) his program of warrantless surveillance as revealed by Snowden, and (2) whacking a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki, without due process, on Fourth and Fifth Amendment grounds respectively. (Bush could and should have been impeached for his warrantless surveillance program, too, even though Pelosi deep-sixed the effort in 2006. Whacking US citizens without due process is, IIRC, Obama's innovation.)
But you can bet that if the wingers do impeach Obama, it's going to be for crazy pants stuff like Benghazi, and not for either of the two "slam dunks." So, if indeed Obama is impeached, will be the wrong reasons, except that both parties will gin up a lot lot of tribal outrage and raise a shit ton of money, and the country will keep sliding on rightward, as executive branch power increases and checks and balances (for example, impeachment) diminishes.
If the right wing impeachment effort were being made in good faith, you'd see some sort of "strange bedfellows" articles; like the slam dunks. But no, you're just seeing red meat for the right. Sad.
UPDATE I forgot the most important part: The play is like Rove's GENIUS play with the Killian memos: Plant fake evidence that supports a true story. Then, when the evidence is discredited, the true story is discredited.